A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

ECO Management: What Matters?

ECO Management: What Matters?
Oleg
Oleg
30 March, 2011 | 3 min for reading

Engineering Change is probably one of the most important and complicated disciplines. I had a chance to meet people that told me – all what you are doing is about ECO management. You can see many examples of ECO management solutions. Almost every software vendor in the field of engineering and enterprise software will propose you kind of the solution. Here is the definition, I grab from Wikipedia about Engineering Change Order:

In a typical system development cycle, the specification or the implementation is likely to change during engineeringdevelopment or during integration of the system elements. These last-minute design changes are commonly referred to as engineering change orders (ECOs) and affect the functionality of a design after it has been wholly or partially completed. ECOs can compensate for design errors found during debug or changes that are made to the design specification to compensate for design problems in other areas of the system design.

However, product development process is very diversified when it comes to real manufacturing companies.  To find a system that can answer on the user’s requirements for ECO is not a simple task. In addition to that, the diversity of available solutions raises multiple questions about what is the most appropriate system for every case.

Engineering Change: Do It Yourself (DIY)?

Last year I posted – How to Manage ECO without paying $1’500 per seat? The point I wanted to make was about how reuse some of the modern technologies to simplify the overall ECO management in the organization. My conclusion was that different organizations can manage ECO differently depends on specific characteristics of product, company environment and organization, which can make DIY approach quite complicated. It made me think and analyze different packages implementing ECO solutions.

Arena Change Management

Take a look on this following video from Arena Solution. I found it very educational. The power of Arena on demand was clear to me in this example. The ability to have seamless access via cloud-based services (or how Arena called it in the beginning “on demand”) can keep all participants in sync regardless on location and time.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gWuoCc00Ik]

Aras Workflow Management

What happens if your company has a high level of change processes complexity? The following video fragment is presenting Aras Innovator Workflow solution. It enables you to realize a comprehensive change process as a workflow. The workflow can be adapted to a specific customer needs. The openness and adaptability is an ultimate advantage of this system.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBD03ggN_WE]

Kubotek ECO Manager

Few weeks ago, I learned about the new tool released by Kubotek. The interesting aspect I discovered in this tool is how it focuses on geometrical aspects of product and changes. It is clear not something you need in every industry. However, for the type of manufacturers in automotive, aerospace, industrial equipment and many other industries requiring 3D and geometry, Kubotec ECO manager can provide a significant value in the way to handle changes.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIfXdK28I8k]

What is my conclusion? ECO is a an important, but very complicated process. It involves many people from organizational departments to work on this and following ECO related activities from inside and outside organization. To have an appropriate tool is important. When you choose a tool, take into the consideration what are specific characteristics of your organization from the standpoint of mobility, complexity, need for visual and 3D before you make a right choice. In parallel, the simplicity of a tool is another important thing. To have a simpler can be a much bigger problem for manufacturers in coming years.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Freebie.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 August, 2011

Note. To be honest, I don’t have much to say with regards to the last Google purchase – Motorola. I’ve...

24 April, 2015

Few months ago, I speculated if Box can become a platform for PLM. Navigate to my previous article to read more...

17 May, 2011

In order to succeed in today’s business environment, software vendors are thinking how to innovate not only with product and...

8 July, 2015

To manage business processes across the manufacturing organization is not a simple job. This is a problem product lifecycle management...

3 December, 2022

PLM adoption is hard. The history of PLM projects start as engineering projects and, unfortunately, struggles with many aspects related...

14 August, 2012

One of the most profound ideas in the history of PLM is the idea of PLM database that contains all...

15 December, 2015

Back in 1990s, I was developing applications for AutoCAD. It was before Windows became popular. I was working for a...

15 July, 2010

The question of identification is probably of the most complicated and always raises lots of interest. I had a chance...

27 May, 2011

What do you think about standards and PLM? For the long time, I thought about standards as toothbrushes. Everybody needs...

Blogroll

To the top