A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Electric Design and PLM Roadmap

Electric Design and PLM Roadmap
Oleg
Oleg
29 June, 2011 | 2 min for reading

In the early beginning, solutions for manufacturing were focusing primarily on machinery and mechanical design. The historical reason here is simple – mechanical design was a key element of manufacturing for many years. However, the era of ‘mechanical design only’ ends. We can hear more and more about various aspects of combined solutions – Siemens PLM was coming with mechatronics already a couple of years ago. Earlier this month, on PlanetPTC, I’ve heard many stories about software related aspects of product design.

I’ve been reading Design New article yesterday – Mentor Takes a Lifecycle Approach to Electrical Design. It talks about latest Mentor announcement related to the expansion of their Capital electric design platform. This is my favorite passage (actually quote by Martin O’Brien):

The new Capital suite delivers on all of its traditional capabilities in addition to new functionality for designing the architecture and aiding service technicians supporting the finished product in the field. It also encompasses enterprise data management and compliance functionality, serving as a single repository to help manage and support the highly specialized materials and workflows associated with seeing a complex electrical system through each phase of its lifecycle.

Does it mean Electric Design is going to PLM route now? This is an interesting question. In my view, PLM approach is very successful when we deal with complex product development issues. Remember aircraft design, product configuration, etc. These are examples where product lifecycle management presented significant improvement and good results. Electrical design was standing separate long time. The same was for electronic and software. Is it going to change now?

The picture is courtesy of Design News blog.

The complexity of products is the real issue we need to discuss and mention in this context. Everything becomes more complex now. Ford T was a simple car. Nowadays, products become really complex. The integration of various elements is key problem manufacturing are facing these days.

What is my conclusion? I can see Mentor is going down to the road and implementing many features and functions we’ve seen in traditional PLM products. Lifecycle, Technical documentation, multiple functional representations. The word “single repository” mentioned by Mr. O’Brien made me worry a bit. In my view, traditional PLMs found themselves in the “single repository” mouse trap by trying to integrate everything in a single database. The cost and complexity of implementations are growing. Is it something vendors like Mentor can avoid? Learn from other mistakes? Is it possible in software word?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 January, 2022

It’s no secret that the manufacturing industry is in a state of flux. Manufacturers are under pressure to keep up...

22 May, 2009

Look on this blog post –3D Warehouse from Google. Does it make sense in context of what CAD/PLM vendors are...

27 November, 2015

Few months ago, I discussed Frame – a technology to bring your existing CAD and maybe PDM / PLM environment...

24 June, 2010

I read Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt – Chrysler’s Engineering Software Shift. In the competitive world of...

20 August, 2010

The following publication in VEKTORRUM got me to review again a book “3D Manufacturing Innovation” by Dr. Hiroshi Toriya. I...

22 August, 2014

I remember one of my birthdays back many years ago. My dad pushed me towards a bookshelf with kids encyclopedia...

12 February, 2009

I’d like to come to raise the idea of visual WIKI. This is a possible way to make PLM more...

3 December, 2010

Collaboration is a tough word. PLM Is using this word all the time. For the last 10-15 years in this...

30 September, 2009

I wanted to share with you funny picture from flowingdata. This picture reminds me a lot about PLM implementations and...

Blogroll

To the top