A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Electric Design and PLM Roadmap

Electric Design and PLM Roadmap
Oleg
Oleg
29 June, 2011 | 2 min for reading

In the early beginning, solutions for manufacturing were focusing primarily on machinery and mechanical design. The historical reason here is simple – mechanical design was a key element of manufacturing for many years. However, the era of ‘mechanical design only’ ends. We can hear more and more about various aspects of combined solutions – Siemens PLM was coming with mechatronics already a couple of years ago. Earlier this month, on PlanetPTC, I’ve heard many stories about software related aspects of product design.

I’ve been reading Design New article yesterday – Mentor Takes a Lifecycle Approach to Electrical Design. It talks about latest Mentor announcement related to the expansion of their Capital electric design platform. This is my favorite passage (actually quote by Martin O’Brien):

The new Capital suite delivers on all of its traditional capabilities in addition to new functionality for designing the architecture and aiding service technicians supporting the finished product in the field. It also encompasses enterprise data management and compliance functionality, serving as a single repository to help manage and support the highly specialized materials and workflows associated with seeing a complex electrical system through each phase of its lifecycle.

Does it mean Electric Design is going to PLM route now? This is an interesting question. In my view, PLM approach is very successful when we deal with complex product development issues. Remember aircraft design, product configuration, etc. These are examples where product lifecycle management presented significant improvement and good results. Electrical design was standing separate long time. The same was for electronic and software. Is it going to change now?

The picture is courtesy of Design News blog.

The complexity of products is the real issue we need to discuss and mention in this context. Everything becomes more complex now. Ford T was a simple car. Nowadays, products become really complex. The integration of various elements is key problem manufacturing are facing these days.

What is my conclusion? I can see Mentor is going down to the road and implementing many features and functions we’ve seen in traditional PLM products. Lifecycle, Technical documentation, multiple functional representations. The word “single repository” mentioned by Mr. O’Brien made me worry a bit. In my view, traditional PLMs found themselves in the “single repository” mouse trap by trying to integrate everything in a single database. The cost and complexity of implementations are growing. Is it something vendors like Mentor can avoid? Learn from other mistakes? Is it possible in software word?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 April, 2010

Last week I had a chance to listen to Mike Payne during the COFES 2010 event in Scottsdale, AZ. Mike’s...

9 August, 2019

One of the most commonly used PLM sales scenarios is to sell it as an expansion of existing PDM system....

27 September, 2020

The model is such a beautiful word. It can be anything. The word model can be a noun, verb, or...

10 February, 2021

The world is moving to platforms and cloud services. It sets an interesting trajectory in the development of enterprise applications...

26 September, 2014

One of the heavily debated topics in CAD/PLM industry is data interoperability. I remember discussion about data interoperability and standards...

27 July, 2010

I read Jim Brown’s Can Siemens Make More Fun with HD-PLM? Jim is writing about the future of PLM experience. I...

30 April, 2010

I’m continuing to hear comments about importance of Open Source for PLM. It comes to me multiple ways during the...

22 August, 2017

Security is important to make cloud solution successful. Even latest researches shows security is not the first concern from companies...

25 September, 2009

The term “management” is very misused, in my view. Long time ago, somebody told me – if you don’t know...

Blogroll

To the top