A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Kenesto vs PLM 360: Apples to Apples?

Kenesto vs PLM 360: Apples to Apples?
Oleg
Oleg
8 June, 2012 | 3 min for reading

Earlier this week, Kenesto – new outfit of Mike Payne announced about general availability of their cloud based business process automation services. If you missed the announcement, navigate your browser to the following link. I blogged about Kenesto before – PLM, Kenesto and Process experience. Released version brings some additional features such as a cloud viewer from TechSoft3D, enhanced reporting and few more. According to Mike Payne:

We have built a product which works the way people want it to without forcing them to change how they work and which delivers technology in precisely the way people want to access it. With Kenesto 2012 we have reached an objective no PLM system has achieved before: practically zero implementation costs for deployment or training.

Autodesk PLM360 vs. Kenesto. Data management is a difference.

Randal Newton of GraphicSpeak coined an interesting term – unPLM. Navigate to the article to read more. Randal is driving some parallels between Autodesk PLM 360 and Kenesto. He is speaking about the amount of processes / solutions as one of the differences, but not only. Here is an interesting passage from the article:

The first product that comes to mind when looking at Kenesto is Autodesk 360 PLM, the cloud-based product lifecycle management system introduced earlier this year. Look past the cloud deployment, the openness about pricing, and the browser-based work environment and there are many differences. Autodesk 360 is aimed at the traditional PLM market, engineering departments; Kenesto is looking at wider deployment in the enterprise.

The comparison between “traditional PLM market, engineering department” and “wider enterprise deployment” is something that caught my attention. I navigated to the previous GraphicSpeak article – Autodesk launches cloud-based PLM. Here is a quote with examples of PLM 360 apps:

Autodesk says 360 is made up of more than 140 apps so far, which can either be used as-is or modified by users. The apps so far fall into ten categories: Quality, Supplier Management, Engineering, Program Management, Service and Support, Operations, Sales and Marketing, Manufacturing, Executives, IT professionals.

It looks like PLM 360 is clearly focused on how to cover all organizational activity and not stopping on the level of PLM for engineering department. When Kenesto is focusing on business automation, PLM 360 provides much more by allowing to manage data and processes beyond engineering. In my view, flexible and adaptable process managament is probably a differentitation. Kenesto can provide it on top of Autodesk PM 360 in order to serve broader set of end users in organization focusing on processes rather than on data management. For the moment, PLM 360 cannot support such a level of flexibility, and it creates an opportunity Kenesto can use. The right question to ask – for how long?

What is my conclusion? Process automation is an important function of many systems and applications. It can be part of PLM, CRM, ERP and other solutions. From that standpoint, Kenesto can potentially serve a much broader audience. However, PLM 360 is managing data. Kenesto is not doing so (at least, for the moment). So, Kenesto can come to the play when data-management problems  already solved (or less important). Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 April, 2015

Few months ago, I speculated if Box can become a platform for PLM. Navigate to my previous article to read more...

20 January, 2015

An interest of customers in cloud PDM solution is growing. I guess there are multiple factors here – awareness about...

17 December, 2023

Selection of PLM technologies and software can be a daunting process. In a competitive market of PLM vendors, the decisions...

6 July, 2018

Growing complexity and longevity of manufacturing products are raising questions about future CAD and PLM platforms. Platform is such a...

28 June, 2018

Manufacturing is transforming. New business models, new products, new technologies. Manufacturing is becoming decentralized and connected. PLM companies are swimming...

3 August, 2015

We often speak about design and lifecycle management complexity of products in automotive, aerospace, defense industries. But what about probably...

17 June, 2015

I’ve been following CIMdata PLM roadmap for HTE event on twitter yesterday. Navigate to the following link if you want to...

6 October, 2009

What I want to discuss today is PLM Best Practices. Frankly saying, my thoughts about the topic were accelerated by...

15 August, 2018

Digital transformation is key initiative for many organizations these days. Every organization these days understands that there is no alternative...

Blogroll

To the top