A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Stability and Managed Chaos

PLM, Stability and Managed Chaos
Oleg
Oleg
26 September, 2012 | 2 min for reading

People are creating ‘chaos’ by the nature of our work. This is a reality in many situations. In my view, it is specifically true when it applies to engineering work. Therefore, when engineering and IT organizations are speaking about PDM/PLM deployment and implementation, the main goal is to establish a controlled environment to prevent chaos, to organize and share information. The goal is clear. However, I want to ask how PLM deployment really fulfills the goal. The main challenge I can see is that organizations are always moving forward. Changes are introduced all the time, processes tend to be customized, altered and re-configured.

I’ve been reading an 3 steps for introducing more chaos into systems (yes, that’s a good thing) ZNET article. Read the article and made your conclusion. I found the following passage interesting:

“Every organization I’ve ever been a part of has spent countless dollars and immeasurable energy striving for stability in which everything is predictable,” he says. “Unfortunately, these are the organizations that recover slowest when the inevitable, unpredictable catastrophe hits.” An apt comparison may be “a search-and-rescue team that sits idle for too long can become rusty under pressure without constant drilling and practice.”

The article made me think about “managed chaos” as a way to run product development processes and engineering organizations in unpredictable situations or with high frequency of changes. PLM system can be a solution to provide an organization with a way to recover and make adaption of product development processes on the fly. Don’t take me wrong. I’m not calling to introduce a chaos in a way company saves and control data, manage revisions and changes. At the same time, when organization hits a request to change suppliers, fix a product problem introduced by customers and react on environmental disaster, PLM will become a system company can rely on.

What is my conclusion? The level of uncertainty in operation of manufacturing companies is growing. There are too many dependencies and too many changes. I can come across multiple examples – environmental chaos, new regulations, supply shortage, economic and regional crises. All together, these things introduce lots of unpredictable changes in organization. To have a flexible system to support organization to overcome the challenge is extremely important. PLM system is a candidate to fulfill the role. Just my thoughts… What is your take?

Best, Oleg

Image: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 August, 2016

PLM was born as a strategy and technology for large organizations. These manufacturing companies supposed to have enough resources and...

13 January, 2014

Crossing boundaries is always lots of fun and opportunities. In blogging, it usually sparks so many discussions between people you...

15 July, 2009

Interesting and intriguing sneak peek of SharePoint 2010 video… Looks like creators of SharePoint is trying to provide major pain...

21 November, 2017

Blockchain topic is extremely hot these days. Earlier this morning, I had a chance to talk with one of my...

22 March, 2013

I learned a new buzzword yesterday. Have you heard about BaaS? Navigate to the following TechCrunch article – Kinvey Launches...

21 September, 2009

As it looks like, the first public results about CAD applications running from cloud are coming from Autodesk. My attention...

12 December, 2019

The year is going to the end and this is the usual time to publish “what is important in the...

12 May, 2010

Everybody in the engineering and manufacturing loves MS Excel. I had chance to write about it multiple times before. You...

9 January, 2020

Companies and businesses need to grow. If they don’t, businesses will die and investors won’t get their money back. According...

Blogroll

To the top