A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Stability and Managed Chaos

PLM, Stability and Managed Chaos
Oleg
Oleg
26 September, 2012 | 2 min for reading

People are creating ‘chaos’ by the nature of our work. This is a reality in many situations. In my view, it is specifically true when it applies to engineering work. Therefore, when engineering and IT organizations are speaking about PDM/PLM deployment and implementation, the main goal is to establish a controlled environment to prevent chaos, to organize and share information. The goal is clear. However, I want to ask how PLM deployment really fulfills the goal. The main challenge I can see is that organizations are always moving forward. Changes are introduced all the time, processes tend to be customized, altered and re-configured.

I’ve been reading an 3 steps for introducing more chaos into systems (yes, that’s a good thing) ZNET article. Read the article and made your conclusion. I found the following passage interesting:

“Every organization I’ve ever been a part of has spent countless dollars and immeasurable energy striving for stability in which everything is predictable,” he says. “Unfortunately, these are the organizations that recover slowest when the inevitable, unpredictable catastrophe hits.” An apt comparison may be “a search-and-rescue team that sits idle for too long can become rusty under pressure without constant drilling and practice.”

The article made me think about “managed chaos” as a way to run product development processes and engineering organizations in unpredictable situations or with high frequency of changes. PLM system can be a solution to provide an organization with a way to recover and make adaption of product development processes on the fly. Don’t take me wrong. I’m not calling to introduce a chaos in a way company saves and control data, manage revisions and changes. At the same time, when organization hits a request to change suppliers, fix a product problem introduced by customers and react on environmental disaster, PLM will become a system company can rely on.

What is my conclusion? The level of uncertainty in operation of manufacturing companies is growing. There are too many dependencies and too many changes. I can come across multiple examples – environmental chaos, new regulations, supply shortage, economic and regional crises. All together, these things introduce lots of unpredictable changes in organization. To have a flexible system to support organization to overcome the challenge is extremely important. PLM system is a candidate to fulfill the role. Just my thoughts… What is your take?

Best, Oleg

Image: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 December, 2016

Dear Friends and Colleagues, The Holiday season is an opportunity to reflect on both the past and the New Year...

25 September, 2014

One of the most interesting trends to watch these days is big data. It started few years ago and I...

23 August, 2019

I’m heading to San-Diego this weekend to present at ConX19 organized by the Institute of Process Excellence. According to IpX,...

4 May, 2015

PDM. Product Data Management was one of the topics engineers are really hating. It was always about slow implementations, complex...

12 September, 2009

Web is coming to every place. I think in retrospective and see web as a next big change in the...

12 April, 2018

SAP is changing their business model. Engineering.com article – First of its Kind: New SAP Pricing Model is Based on...

4 June, 2018

In my article last week – How to avoid “focus on business” cliche in PLM sales , I introduced typical PLM...

22 January, 2016

Old concepts are sticky. Think about QUERTY keyboard. It was designed almost 150 years ago with a special reason –...

11 June, 2017

  NuoDB article – Product Lifecycle Management and the Cloud written by well-known PLM analyst Jim Brown caught me by the...

Blogroll

To the top