A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: from EGOsystem to ECOsystem

PLM: from EGOsystem to ECOsystem
Oleg
Oleg
30 November, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I just came back AU2012 in Las Vegas. Among many meetings, I had during AU, I attended Innovation Forum – The Reality of the cloud. The reality of events these days that you can attend actively by participating in social networking via Twitter. One of the tweets during the cloud presentation was Chad Jackson’s: – Think about data as an eco-system.

 

It made me think about PLM as data eco-system. Watch Gerd Leonhard presentation- The future of the internet (SoLoMo) futuristic presentation with strange title – Big Data, Big Mobile, Big Social. I found it is interesting. Navigate here to take a look.

Few slides caught my special attention in the context of PLM and Data Ecosystem discussion. One of them is related to Paul Baran research back in 1960 (way before the internet and even early PLM systems). He was pioneering some of early work related to computer networks. Navigate to the following link to read more. Here is an interesting passage:

The pioneering research of Paul Baran in the 1960s, who envisioned a communications network that would survive a major enemy attacked. The sketch shows three different network topologies described in his RAND Memorandum. The distributed network structure offered the best survivability.

Another slide that sticks in my memory was the comparison of Egosystem and Ecosystem. That slide made me laugh. Especially when I put it next to one of my previous post about PLM Egoism. Think about PLM system transformation. A year ago, during AU2011, I was talking about transformation from Database to Networks. This slide is representing the way how ego-centric PLMs need to be transformed into reliable and modern PLM eco systems.

What is my conclusion? Today’s PLM EGOsystems are not sustainable. The centralized approach made PLM implementation weak and not able to survive long term lifecycle, evolution and business changes. The result is heavy PLM systems that require propriety maintenance. Change management of these systems is either expensive or impossible. It is a time to think about data networks and networked system models. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

pictures courtesy of gleonhard presentation

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 February, 2017

There is no secrets – traditional PLM systems are running on top of relational databases systems. Although I didn’t find...

23 May, 2021

I’d like to continue the series of articles about different aspects of PLM and ERP software, vendors, and business. In...

11 December, 2011

I’m a bit late with my top 5 review for November. It was a tough month for me because of...

7 October, 2010

I read a blog post by Stephen Porter of Zero Wait State called – The PLM State: Why can’t we...

29 September, 2015

Mass production involves making many copies of product, very quickly for lowest possible cost. It is all about producing standardized...

2 March, 2011

Choose the platform for your software becomes a new issue in 2010s. Platform was kind of easy story for the...

27 April, 2017

“Connected” is a new magic buzzword. Everything is connected these days. The world is changing because of new ways to...

15 September, 2016

Single BOM is such of these topics that usually drives lot of debates. You can catch up on my very...

6 April, 2018

I’m coming back from Ann Arbor Michigan where I attended CIMdata North American PLM industry and market forum. You can...

Blogroll

To the top