A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM adoption and CAD management valley of death

PLM adoption and CAD management valley of death
Oleg
Oleg
5 March, 2013 | 2 min for reading

The issue of PLM adoption remains critical, in my view. Even if we can see more examples of PLM implementations, companies usually consider “PLM project” as something that needs to be taken with care, significant amount of planning and justification. So, I wanted to ask “why it happens”? The traditional answer mostly coming from PLM vendors and PLM consulting is leading to the complexity of business processes, the need of people to change and technological challenges related to implementation and customization of systems. Usually, vendors and consulting are working with CAD/IT managers that lead “engineering part” of the implementation. In parallel, PLM consulting often dream to work with C-level people in a company to define better alignment of PLM strategy.

I want to raise a question of balance between engineering IT / CAD managers and more strategic PLM business planning. Here is the thing – even if companies are succeeding in making strategic planning for future business and product planning development changes, CAD management is still can create too many complication on the way. CAD management is complicated, requires lengthy implementations, data import and… more important – change the way engineers and designers are working by introducing “data management”. The last one is hated by everybody hates because of complexity.

In addition to complexity, CAD data management introduces an issue of compatibility between different CAD systems and PDM components. New trend to solve this problem is to use PDM system of the same CAD vendor. It simplifies CAD/PDM integration, but introduces the problem of multiple PDM/PLM system integration.  CAD management (PDM) projects often positioned as an introductory step in PLM implementations often end up as a long and painful journey.

What is my conclusion? In my view, CAD management is a valley of death for many PLM implementations. Many PLM consulting and even some PLM vendors are trying to avoid and position PLM implementations “beyond CAD/PDM”. It certainly gives some advantages, but (in my view) just hides the real problem of bad engineering data management. Engineering data from CAD is an important element of change management and many other PLM-related processes. As we move to more agile and efficient product development process management, to solve the problem of CAD data management and PDM becomes very important. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 January, 2018

In technology world, there is a perception that the company that wins is the one that enters first into the...

28 February, 2018

PDM (or PLM) was born as idea of centralization of data and processes under single roof (actually database).  Back 30-40...

19 January, 2018

The topic of PLM ranking is getting some traction recently in the conversation with my readers and industry peers. Check...

4 September, 2023

In the age of digital transformation, enterprises are constantly striving to harness the vast potential of emerging technologies to stay...

17 January, 2018

Consumer technologies made a huge impact on enterprise software for the last decade. Think about many aspects of what data...

5 December, 2014

One of the topics I touched in my yesterday post about future PLM platforms is platform migration. The ability of customer...

15 August, 2019

It has been a little bit over a decade since I started to write my PLM blog. Started with a...

4 January, 2010

It’s over. 2009… The loooooong weekend was a perfect time to think about last year, summarize, statistics, reviews, read an...

19 July, 2009

Note toward future. After long Microsoft related discussion about Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010, final, and more future oriented, prompt...

Blogroll

To the top