A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM adoption and CAD management valley of death

PLM adoption and CAD management valley of death
Oleg
Oleg
5 March, 2013 | 2 min for reading

The issue of PLM adoption remains critical, in my view. Even if we can see more examples of PLM implementations, companies usually consider “PLM project” as something that needs to be taken with care, significant amount of planning and justification. So, I wanted to ask “why it happens”? The traditional answer mostly coming from PLM vendors and PLM consulting is leading to the complexity of business processes, the need of people to change and technological challenges related to implementation and customization of systems. Usually, vendors and consulting are working with CAD/IT managers that lead “engineering part” of the implementation. In parallel, PLM consulting often dream to work with C-level people in a company to define better alignment of PLM strategy.

I want to raise a question of balance between engineering IT / CAD managers and more strategic PLM business planning. Here is the thing – even if companies are succeeding in making strategic planning for future business and product planning development changes, CAD management is still can create too many complication on the way. CAD management is complicated, requires lengthy implementations, data import and… more important – change the way engineers and designers are working by introducing “data management”. The last one is hated by everybody hates because of complexity.

In addition to complexity, CAD data management introduces an issue of compatibility between different CAD systems and PDM components. New trend to solve this problem is to use PDM system of the same CAD vendor. It simplifies CAD/PDM integration, but introduces the problem of multiple PDM/PLM system integration.  CAD management (PDM) projects often positioned as an introductory step in PLM implementations often end up as a long and painful journey.

What is my conclusion? In my view, CAD management is a valley of death for many PLM implementations. Many PLM consulting and even some PLM vendors are trying to avoid and position PLM implementations “beyond CAD/PDM”. It certainly gives some advantages, but (in my view) just hides the real problem of bad engineering data management. Engineering data from CAD is an important element of change management and many other PLM-related processes. As we move to more agile and efficient product development process management, to solve the problem of CAD data management and PDM becomes very important. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 April, 2022

I’m coming from the first in-person PLM conference that happened yesterday in Ann Arbor, MI. It was a great place...

17 November, 2015

I spent some time yesterday watching Dassault Systemes 3DEXPERIENCE Forum live streaming from Boston. Speakers – Bernard Charles and Monica Menghini of...

26 February, 2019

My attention was caught by CIMdata commentary about expanding of 3DEXPERIENCE platform – report SOLIDWORKS World 2019. Navigate here to...

27 August, 2023

Startups are brutal. According to multiple statistics from Forbes, CB Insight, and other sources, 90% to 97% of startups will...

13 January, 2016

Back to New Year celebration, I bought the iTwinkle Light made by GE in Home Depot. It has many features, connects...

26 August, 2016

The old joke says you can take any word from a terminological lexicon of manufacturing company and turn it into...

5 June, 2009

I was reading Jos Voskuil’s post, “Where does PLM start beyond document management”. I think Jos raised a very valid...

30 July, 2010

The following blog article caught my attention last week – “Four recommendations for better Excel BOMs” in Arena Solutions blog...

5 December, 2008

I think everybody knows about Wiki. (Wikipedia definitions of wiki software). Today Wiki engines became very popular and affordable. There...

Blogroll

To the top