A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM adoption and CAD management valley of death

PLM adoption and CAD management valley of death
Oleg
Oleg
5 March, 2013 | 2 min for reading

The issue of PLM adoption remains critical, in my view. Even if we can see more examples of PLM implementations, companies usually consider “PLM project” as something that needs to be taken with care, significant amount of planning and justification. So, I wanted to ask “why it happens”? The traditional answer mostly coming from PLM vendors and PLM consulting is leading to the complexity of business processes, the need of people to change and technological challenges related to implementation and customization of systems. Usually, vendors and consulting are working with CAD/IT managers that lead “engineering part” of the implementation. In parallel, PLM consulting often dream to work with C-level people in a company to define better alignment of PLM strategy.

I want to raise a question of balance between engineering IT / CAD managers and more strategic PLM business planning. Here is the thing – even if companies are succeeding in making strategic planning for future business and product planning development changes, CAD management is still can create too many complication on the way. CAD management is complicated, requires lengthy implementations, data import and… more important – change the way engineers and designers are working by introducing “data management”. The last one is hated by everybody hates because of complexity.

In addition to complexity, CAD data management introduces an issue of compatibility between different CAD systems and PDM components. New trend to solve this problem is to use PDM system of the same CAD vendor. It simplifies CAD/PDM integration, but introduces the problem of multiple PDM/PLM system integration.  CAD management (PDM) projects often positioned as an introductory step in PLM implementations often end up as a long and painful journey.

What is my conclusion? In my view, CAD management is a valley of death for many PLM implementations. Many PLM consulting and even some PLM vendors are trying to avoid and position PLM implementations “beyond CAD/PDM”. It certainly gives some advantages, but (in my view) just hides the real problem of bad engineering data management. Engineering data from CAD is an important element of change management and many other PLM-related processes. As we move to more agile and efficient product development process management, to solve the problem of CAD data management and PDM becomes very important. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 July, 2022

SaaS is growing and I can see every day how manufacturing companies are adopting SaaS solutions. What was a vision...

16 June, 2011

As you probably know, I spent the beginning of the week in Las-Vegas attending Planet PTC Live 2011. Those of...

30 July, 2009

There are numerous ways in which people changed way they communicate for the last decades. Email is definitely one of...

4 February, 2010

I want to discuss CAE today. CAE is considered as a technology to support engineers in tasks such as analysis,...

14 January, 2014

How do you trap a big monkey in a small cage the size of a banana? Easy! You place a...

9 February, 2015

Dear friends! I wanted to share some personal news with you. I decided to make a next change in my...

16 January, 2014

Last year I was writing about PLM and PaaS dilemma. As we move more into diversity of cloud PLM options,...

20 September, 2016

The last decade of open source, mobile and web development taught us that to create software can be easy. Don’t...

31 October, 2017

Engineering.com article – A Big Win as Yamaha “Does a Daimler” and Chooses Siemens PLM brings up big debates about Dassault...

Blogroll

To the top