A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why versioning is complicated in PDM?

Why versioning is complicated in PDM?
Oleg
Oleg
7 March, 2013 | 3 min for reading

After 20+ years of CAD and PDM development, the issue of versioning is not solved. How about that? I hope, I’ve got your attention :). Versions, revisions, changes, CAD models, drawings, parts… My experience is that as soon as it comes to engineers, revisions are getting messy. I touched it in my previous posts few times. If you want to refresh your memories navigate to Revisions in CAD, PLM, ERP: old problems or new challenges? A bit old (from 2010), but still very relevant post – Future CAD-PLM and Assembly Version Management. As a confirmation that topic is alive and not solved, I just read Minerva blog – Versioning, different meaning from one activity to another by Yoann Maingon. It is short a sweet, so take few minutes and have a read. Yoann is speaking about “difference in intentions”. Here is the main point of the writeup:

…it is sometimes hard for people to have a common way to think about versioning. For the software development oriented person, versionning means saving or tagging. It means that the actual work has to be saved because we want to keep a state of the actual work. “I want to keep a state, I make a version, this version is stored”. In my view, related to main PLM concepts, versioning is creating something new. “I want to start a new work or I want to change a document, I version it. my new version is my working copy”.

If I speak about CAD/PLM software, here is the root of the problem. PDM systems create too many options in the mechanism of versions by implying “creation of something new” in place where it is absolutely unnecessarily. It was done by so many PDM systems in so many different ways with one common mistake – try to capture the intent of change and related dependent changes. The right answer to me is different. Versioning (and PDM is not different from software development and just Microsoft Word) is only about making “change” in the content (3D model, drawing, source code, assembly, configuration, etc). The role of PDM software is to capture the change and make it available for history tracking. You can ask me what about Parts, Revisions and other configuration management aspects? In my view, the answer on this question in the context of PDM/PLM is straightforward – use Parts, Part Numbers and Part Revisions (if needed).

What is my conclusion? Versioning is a mechanism that helps people to capture a change. Not the intent of change, but the change. It must be flexible and configurable, but at the end of the days, simple and reliable. I don’t want to miss my changes and I don’t want to run as a dog in order to find a right change.  Most of PDM/PLM software created a complicated versioning systems. I don’t see much difference between PDM and software. With the amount of software code we have in products, these two options will come together sooner than later. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 July, 2018

PLM is usually a journey of an organization transforming itself from one business model into another. While the process can...

17 August, 2012

I think the agreement about importance of the data model among all implementers of PDM / PLM is almost absolute....

21 April, 2021

During the last few days, I’ve been getting many questions about Autodesk and Upchain. Thanks to all my online and...

23 March, 2010

I came across the interesting blog article in CIO online “Why the New Normal Could Kill IT?” by Thomas Weilgum...

17 January, 2019

The article today will be unusual. I was inspired by one of my readers to create an hierarchy of technology and...

12 March, 2020

Earlier last week, I attended the PTC Onshape Product Development Cloud Forum. Check out my article here () if you...

11 November, 2012

Microsoft is releasing to manufacturing Office 2013 version. For many years, Office was a symbol of Microsoft’s desktop empire. Not...

4 October, 2009

New week start. Interesting prompt related to free and open source software. Take a look on a quite impressive list...

28 July, 2014

One of the topics that usually raises a lot of debates is Part Numbers. One of my first takes on...

Blogroll

To the top