A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM will embed information in products?

How PLM will embed information in products?
Oleg
Oleg
24 July, 2013 | 2 min for reading

Experience is a new modern hype. You can see it everywhere these days. User experience, selling experience, learning experience, total experience, etc. You can continue the list… I want to talk about  “product experience” today. This is obvious and new at the same time. Manufacturers are interested to know more about their products. It related to sales, usage, problem reports and defects, maintenance, etc. It becomes almost obvious – the more information you get about usage of your product during whole product cycle – the better you can do. I like old, but famous quote by W. Edwards Deming – “You can’t manage what you can’t measure.

An interesting article by SolidSmack caught my attention earlier today – InfraStructs: Embedded ID Tags in 3D Printed Objects Eliminate Need for RFID and Barcodes. The article speaks about how to embed the information in 3D printed objects:

California event is the announcement from Microsoft Research that they are developing embedded ID tags for 3D printed objects. Titled InfraStructs, the internal tags are created from the same 3D printing process already used to create the intended, printed object; effectively generating an internal, invisible tag that can be read with a terahertz (THz) imaging scanner.

How manufacturers will use and why PLM vendors will benefit is? The premise of existing RFID technology is to use a specific tag that must be attached to product that will allow to tag manufacturing items, spare parts during whole lifecycle. The idea was good, but the implementation is a bit complicated and still costly. By direct embedding of additional information manufacturing can achieve the next level of efficiency. Here is another passage from the article.

Ultimately, the benefit of this approach for manufacturers is that they can embed unique information such as serial numbers or simple programs in coded tags by integrating the design into a pre-determined 3D printed design. In turn, this eliminates the potential need for other (and oftentimes more expensive) identification systems such a RFID tags and electronic chips that can add cost and complexity to the manufacturing, as well as the need for bar codes which can be cumbersome to work with and are vulnerable to tampering.

What is my conclusion? We are moving towards connected world, where design and engineering parts will be more connected to their physical implementations. It will allow better measurement of  product experience and, as a result -better product lifecycle management. Just my thought…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 October, 2014

Companies are moving to cloud these days. The question vendors and customers are asking today is how do we move...

10 December, 2011

One of the biggest problem I can see in all PDM / PLM tools is a high level of the...

5 February, 2012

Social is one of the topics I’m discussing frequently on my blog. Today, I would like to take a different...

4 December, 2018

Cloud PDM is the topic I’ve been following for some time. Check my articles about cloud PDM here. One of...

6 October, 2015

Enterprise software customizations are painful. Remember my old post – Is PLM customization a data management Titanic? Nobody likes to customize...

27 May, 2020

Lionel Grealou posted open for debate article – The Place of PLM in the Digital Future (open to debate). I...

30 September, 2009

I think, we’ve faced many changes during past few years related to how enterprise software is going to be implemented....

27 June, 2011

Brian Roepke of Autodesk brought my attention to Autodesk Nitrous Lab Project earlier this week. The context of this comment...

2 April, 2014

In my recent post about bill of materials – Bill of Materials (BOM): process or technology challenge? I touched the variety...

Blogroll

To the top