A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Will Google Set Future PLM Information Standards?

Will Google Set Future PLM Information Standards?
Oleg
Oleg
5 December, 2013 | 3 min for reading

GKS-car-info

One of the core capabilities of Product Lifecycle Management is the ability to define and manage a variety of information about product – requirements, design, engineering, manufacturing, support, supply, etc. In order to do so, PLM vendors developed data management technologies and flexible frameworks that can handle product data. You may find some of my previous posts about PLM data modeling  – PLM and Data Model Pyramid and What is the right data model for PLM?

Nowadays, Data Management is going through a cambrian explosion of database options. I touched it a bit in my writeup PLM and Data Modeling Flux. If you have few free minutes over the weekend, take a look on the presentation – PLM and Data Management in 21st century I shared on TechSoft TechTalk few weeks ago in Boston.

The biggest problem in handling product data and information is related to a growing complexity of data and dependencies. In addition to original complexity of multidisciplinary data representations (design, engineering, manufacturing), we can see a growing needs to manage customer data, supply chain, social networks, etc. I’ve been pointing on Google Knowledge Graph as one of the interesting technologies to maintain a complex set of interlinked information. Read my post – Why PLM need to learn about Google Knowledge Graph to learn more. Google is not the only vendor interested in how to maintain product data. My post – 3 things PLM can learn from UCO (Used Car Ontology) speaks about variety of technologies used to model car product information.

The following article caught my attention this morning (thanks to one of my blog readers) – Google adds car facts, prices to its Knowledge Graph. I found it very interesting and connected to my previous thoughts about how product information can be managed in the future. Here is a passage from the article:

Starting today, users can search the make, model, and year of a car to find out a variety of information, directly from the Google search page. For instance, if you search “Tesla Model S”, the Knowledge Graph will now show up and present you with the MSRP, horsepower, miles-per-gallon, make, and available trims. Different cars show a different set information, as well. Should you search “Ford Focus”, you will be presented with the MSRP, MPG, and horsepower, as well as the engine size, body styles, and other years.

I made few searches and captured following screenshots. You can see how Google Knowledge Graph semantically recognizes right information and snippets of data about vehicle.

MB-GL-GKS-info

The following set of information about Mazda6 also presents the fact GKS keeps the information about multiple models and model years (revisions?).

mazda6-2014-GKS

 

Mazda6-2012-GKS-info

What is my conclusion? Most of CAD/PLM companies are very protective about data models and the ways they store, manage and share data. It can provide a potential problem in the future, which will probably will become more open and transparent. We clearly need to think what standards can support future product information modeling. Here is the thing – consumerization can come to this space exactly in the same way it came to some other domains. The future product information management standards might be developed by web giants and other companies outside of CAD/PLM space. Data architects and technologies must take a note. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

*picture is courtesy of http://9to5google.com blog. 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 September, 2015

Mass production involves making many copies of product, very quickly for lowest possible cost. It is all about producing standardized...

30 September, 2009

I wanted to share with you funny picture from flowingdata. This picture reminds me a lot about PLM implementations and...

7 April, 2014

Cloud becomes more and more an obsolete additional word to call every technology we develop I hardly can image anything...

21 March, 2019

I’m coming to SuiteWorlds 2019 in a few weeks. I visited it last year and I liked it. If you missed my...

8 November, 2013

It was a big Twitter day. Twitter IPO generated an overflow of news, articles, memorable stories. For me, twitter become...

20 June, 2012

IP Management. If you’re in PLM business most probably you had a chance to hear this term. Most of the...

26 July, 2020

For those of your long time with PLM and Enterprise Software, I bet you’ve heard about TLA, which stands for...

26 June, 2009

Well, Product Lifecycle Management sounds like a very profound concept. I can see organizational benefits, values, etc… etc… But I’m...

8 April, 2009

  Everything in our life is seems to be a project. It can start from a very simple set of...

Blogroll

To the top