A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM can solve problem of global BOM transparency

How PLM can solve problem of global BOM transparency
Oleg
Oleg
20 February, 2014 | 3 min for reading

plm-global-bom-supply-chain

Business is going global. It is not only for large manufacturing companies these days. As a result of cost pressure and searches for new market opportunities, manufacturing companies are looking how to optimize their businesses. Distributed engineering, manufacturing and suppliers environments – reality of manufacturing these days.

However, outsourcing and future development of supply chain also brings additional challenges. Distributed environment and supply chain collaboration bring additional level of complexity. Combined with growing regulatory requirement it resulted in significant pressure on manufacturing companies to provide transparency of product information for regulatory purposes.

CSRWire article Complying with Supply Chain Transparency: Underlying Issues Lead to Regulation Backlash brings an interesting perspective on the need of manufacturing companies to expose bill of material information across supply chain. Here is a passage I captured:

Currently, there is a gap in the product information shared between the two [contract manufacturers]. The nature of that model is such that retailers either pick from a catalog or provide product specifications and tolerances for manufacturing but never see the finished product’s bill of materials.  That becomes a challenge for documenting environmental and social compliance requirements, as the data stays solely in the contract manufacturer’s product lifecycle management system.

It made me think about how to make product information available downstream in every manufacturing organization and across supply chain. Majority of PLM systems deployed today are focusing on the needs of engineering departments. It serves product development and implementation of engineering-manufacturing collaboration. Which leaves supply chain and contractor manufacturing out of focus. Below, I outlined some functional and business requirements PLM system and vendors can follow to solve the problem of BOM transparency across supply chain:

1- PLM systems need to be deployed beyond engineering organization and become easy available for suppliers and contractors.

2- Bill of Material tools need to support product information beyond development and engineering. It raises the question of manufacturing bills and sub-contractor bills.

3- PLM business models should be adapted to serve new type of users – suppliers and sub-contractors.

According to CSRWire article, manufacturing companies are ready to pay a lot of money these days to solve regulatory compliance issues. It becomes very sensitive for small and medium size organization that cannot afford additional regulatory expenses and extensive paper work related product transparency. I liked the following quote explaining that:

If large corporations are struggling with compliance and transparency, how can small- and medium-size businesses manage these regulations and pressure? Many simply can’t afford it. It puts small and medium businesses at a competitive disadvantage. It’s a time, cost, effort and resource issue. The corporations will figure out a way to do this cost effectively. The bigger companies can help evolve the tools, systems and practices. I don’t think anyone has a comprehensive solution right now. The small- and medium-size businesses still have to comply but if we keep piling compliance cost on top of compliance cost, it becomes unsustainable.

What is my conclusion? There is an opportunity to solve regulatory problem of manufacturing companies of all sizes (and specifically small manufacturers) by providing cloud PLM system making Bill of Material transparent for everybody in supply chain of contractors and manufacturers. Two main challenges here – robust BOM tools capturing manufacturing and contractor information and easy to deploy tools with affordable licenses. The opportunity is on the table. The note for PLM vendor strategists. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 December, 2015

Earlier this year I wrote about 5 important things about PLM for hardware startup. It came down to management of...

28 May, 2012

The following twitter message from @raykurland of TechniCom, NJ market research and consulting firm woke me up during the long Memorial...

30 October, 2017

I was catching up on some of my online reading. CIMdata commentary on Oracle Open World was one of the...

26 January, 2025

I’m preparing for Dassault 3DEXPERIENCE World 2025 in a little bit less then a month. The event links is here...

7 April, 2024

The complexity of products has grown enormously for the last decade. The growing number of manufacturing companies are moving their...

30 September, 2023

The LinkedIn post about upcoming roundtable and discussion with an interesting topic –Creating a Profession for PLM Practitioners triggered some...

12 June, 2009

 It’s impossible to speak about collaboration these days, in my opinion,  without touching Google Wave. I analyzed multiple presentations, demos,...

11 January, 2013

Bill of Materials. Probably the key element in product development and manufacturing. Surprisingly enough, many companies are still struggling with...

10 September, 2009

My today’s post on 3D Perspectives is about how to visualize hierarchical information. In CAD and PLM we put a...

Blogroll

To the top