A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM can stop living in the future?

How PLM can stop living in the future?
Oleg
Oleg
30 April, 2014 | 2 min for reading

time-paradox-past-future-present

One of my favorite keynotes last week at COFES 2014 took me to the definition of time paradox and how different time orientation can reflect personal happiness. People are usually in one of the three time phases orientation – past, present or future. It appears that such presence phases have influence on lots of aspects of people’s behavior. If you never heard about this (like me until last week), the following video by Philip Zimbardo – The psychology of time is a very good starting point to learn about it. I’m looking forward to read Time Paradox book coming weekend.

COFES keynote time paradox made talks me think that time phase orientation can be applied organizational behavior as well as vendor-customer relationships. The realization that PLM vendor and PLM customer may be seeing the world very differently is important. Evermore, it can lead to understanding of how to improve that behavior and “customer happiness”.

In my view most of PLM vendors as well as technological providers are future phase, which makes a lot of sense. From that standpoint, I can see PLM is standing out, especially when it comes to SME organization. For many of them, technologies are mostly meaningless. To think about process improvement? Meh… What is important is to get job done and deliver orders. Which made me think about customers are in present phase. It come with risk management, cost optimization, interest to protect current job and current business status, etc.

It is very hard (almost impossible) to change people. It will take long time to make customer re-think how to perceive future tech investment. At the same time, vendors need to learn how to become more present oriented and turn PLM solutions that can bring short term practical benefits without significant investment from their side.

What is my conclusion? Customers are demonstrating high level of resilience against technological changes. For most cases, they see it as a disturbance. Vendors need to find a way to show more customer-orientation – it will help to bridge between future and present time orientation and move implementation focus into present time. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 May, 2016

It has been only four years since Autodesk formally joined “PLM club” by introducing Autodesk PLM360. You can get my...

4 December, 2018

Cloud PDM is the topic I’ve been following for some time. Check my articles about cloud PDM here. One of...

21 December, 2017

Long time ago I found an interesting statistic about Dropbox usage by engineering departments. It was the time when PLM...

11 July, 2020

A new name caught my attention earlier this week- Digital Twin Core (DTC). The name belongs to Aras Corp announcing...

20 March, 2014

Almost two years ago I posted my Mobile PLM gold rush – did vendors miss the point? post. Mobile usage is skyrocketing....

30 July, 2010

Do you see any connection between Product Lifecycle Management and Public data? Actually, I do. I think, one of the...

1 June, 2012

Let me start today from asking you a question. How do you run your company? Regardless on size, scale and...

3 September, 2021

Data is one of the most valuable assets of the 21st century and businesses are desperately looking for how to...

15 December, 2023

Earlier this week, I attended CIMdata webinar. The goal for webinar was to provide a brief review of PLM economy...

Blogroll

To the top