A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM can stop living in the future?

How PLM can stop living in the future?
Oleg
Oleg
30 April, 2014 | 2 min for reading

time-paradox-past-future-present

One of my favorite keynotes last week at COFES 2014 took me to the definition of time paradox and how different time orientation can reflect personal happiness. People are usually in one of the three time phases orientation – past, present or future. It appears that such presence phases have influence on lots of aspects of people’s behavior. If you never heard about this (like me until last week), the following video by Philip Zimbardo – The psychology of time is a very good starting point to learn about it. I’m looking forward to read Time Paradox book coming weekend.

COFES keynote time paradox made talks me think that time phase orientation can be applied organizational behavior as well as vendor-customer relationships. The realization that PLM vendor and PLM customer may be seeing the world very differently is important. Evermore, it can lead to understanding of how to improve that behavior and “customer happiness”.

In my view most of PLM vendors as well as technological providers are future phase, which makes a lot of sense. From that standpoint, I can see PLM is standing out, especially when it comes to SME organization. For many of them, technologies are mostly meaningless. To think about process improvement? Meh… What is important is to get job done and deliver orders. Which made me think about customers are in present phase. It come with risk management, cost optimization, interest to protect current job and current business status, etc.

It is very hard (almost impossible) to change people. It will take long time to make customer re-think how to perceive future tech investment. At the same time, vendors need to learn how to become more present oriented and turn PLM solutions that can bring short term practical benefits without significant investment from their side.

What is my conclusion? Customers are demonstrating high level of resilience against technological changes. For most cases, they see it as a disturbance. Vendors need to find a way to show more customer-orientation – it will help to bridge between future and present time orientation and move implementation focus into present time. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 November, 2011

Cloud big time… It is probably coming to General Motors. Google is fighting against Microsoft to supply 100’00 license deal...

14 July, 2009

At its Worldwide Partner Conference in New Orleans, Microsoft released a preview of Office 2010 and Visio 2010 to all...

15 October, 2020

PLM companies turned digital overnight. Visit every website of PLM vendors, consulting, resellers and you will find that they are...

17 January, 2010

Last week I had chance to read Forbes’s article (Listen To Competitors — Not Customers), which made me think more...

11 April, 2014

One of the most popular topics in engineering (but not only) software ecosystem. Open vs. Close. I’ve been discussing it...

20 May, 2019

Verdi Ogewell, the Editor-in-Chief of VerkstadsForum PLM Magazine and ENGINEERING.com’s European correspondent publish his next PLM failure bombshells – Telecom...

28 January, 2012

What do you think about the future designer workspace? I assume some of my readers remember drawing board in multiple...

20 June, 2012

IP Management. If you’re in PLM business most probably you had a chance to hear this term. Most of the...

5 June, 2014

You may think engineers like everything new. You may think it is so obvious. Engineers are developing all new technologies,...

Blogroll

To the top