A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM can stop living in the future?

How PLM can stop living in the future?
Oleg
Oleg
30 April, 2014 | 2 min for reading

time-paradox-past-future-present

One of my favorite keynotes last week at COFES 2014 took me to the definition of time paradox and how different time orientation can reflect personal happiness. People are usually in one of the three time phases orientation – past, present or future. It appears that such presence phases have influence on lots of aspects of people’s behavior. If you never heard about this (like me until last week), the following video by Philip Zimbardo – The psychology of time is a very good starting point to learn about it. I’m looking forward to read Time Paradox book coming weekend.

COFES keynote time paradox made talks me think that time phase orientation can be applied organizational behavior as well as vendor-customer relationships. The realization that PLM vendor and PLM customer may be seeing the world very differently is important. Evermore, it can lead to understanding of how to improve that behavior and “customer happiness”.

In my view most of PLM vendors as well as technological providers are future phase, which makes a lot of sense. From that standpoint, I can see PLM is standing out, especially when it comes to SME organization. For many of them, technologies are mostly meaningless. To think about process improvement? Meh… What is important is to get job done and deliver orders. Which made me think about customers are in present phase. It come with risk management, cost optimization, interest to protect current job and current business status, etc.

It is very hard (almost impossible) to change people. It will take long time to make customer re-think how to perceive future tech investment. At the same time, vendors need to learn how to become more present oriented and turn PLM solutions that can bring short term practical benefits without significant investment from their side.

What is my conclusion? Customers are demonstrating high level of resilience against technological changes. For most cases, they see it as a disturbance. Vendors need to find a way to show more customer-orientation – it will help to bridge between future and present time orientation and move implementation focus into present time. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 May, 2025

Let’s talk about PLM architecture. A recent post and comments by Andreas Lindenthal triggered a fresh wave of discussion around...

21 August, 2014

The new normal – we need less money to build software these days. My attention caught Andreessen Horowitz article The...

7 December, 2017

Earlier today my attention was caught by Forrester PLM research for discrete manufacturing industry. Almost simultaneously, two PLM vendors –...

7 March, 2012

One of the companies I’m watching is GrabCAD. Earlier, I was talking about GrabCAD’s idea of open CAD library and...

22 November, 2018

It hard to make a change when operating in your comfort zone. I decided to push myself out of blogging...

22 March, 2018

I was invited to speak at Develop3D Live 2018 about Data Management. If you followed my blog earlier, you might...

17 November, 2017

During my last day at AU2017 I attended Manufacturing Keynote presented by Liz Campbell and Steve Hooper. It was a...

23 August, 2009

The following article got to my attention this morning. Newsgator started back in 2004 as RSS syndication and stretching their...

30 September, 2023

The LinkedIn post about upcoming roundtable and discussion with an interesting topic –Creating a Profession for PLM Practitioners triggered some...

Blogroll

To the top