A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Integration is still the major challenge in PLM adoption

Integration is still the major challenge in PLM adoption
Oleg
Oleg
30 November, 2014 | 2 min for reading

data-silos

I want to continue the discussion about data ownership and synchronization between islands of information in a company. EBOM and MBOM synchronization I mentioned in my previous post is probably the most typical one. But there are many others. Supply chain, contract manufacturing, regulation, customer support and services – this is only very short list where data stays under control of different systems. Even the idea of pulling data under a control of single system was an option a decade ago, my hunch that these days, the idea of PLM one big silo is getting less popular.

Control Engineering Asia published an article Hitachi Sunway Talks PLM Opportunities and Developments. Thammaya Chuay-iam of Hitachi Sunway Information Systems in Tailand, shared his thoughts about some of the major trends happening in the PLM sector in Asia, the opportunities and challenges. One of the topics caught my attention. It was specifically related to the issue of integration. Here is my favorite passage:

[Q] What are the biggest challenges being faced by manufacturers when it comes to their PLM activities? [A] Even though PLM initiatives within global companies have developed significantly over the years, the core challenge of the manufacturing industry remains the ever-growing need for consistent integration between PLM solutions and other enterprise systems. Another challenge is the need for focused solutions that address the needs of targeted groups within the PLM environment.

It made me think again about integration topic. The problem is here for the last 20-25 years. In many situations, the solutions companies are using remain unchanged for decades. It is brutal export/import/sync of data. It brings complexity and it cost money.

What is my conclusion? I guess the fundamental idea of “data pumping” between different systems should be replaced by something better. I’ve been touching it in my post about data ownership and data sharing. Web technologies can give us a better way to share, link and intertwine data. I believe it can be a better way and it will replace brutal data synchronization. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 August, 2009

I’m constantly looking for new technologies and perspectives of PLM improvement. For the last time, we discussed many products and...

13 May, 2023

Events are coming back. WHO chief declares end to COVID-19 as a global health emergency, which marks the end of...

29 September, 2017

Last week I attended Autodesk Accelerate event in Boston. If you missed my notes, you can catchup here. One of...

28 July, 2024

In my recent article about the growing importance of Manufacturing BOM (MBOM) management, I explored various integration methods between CAD,...

10 February, 2015

I want to step back and look on PLM development trends for the last 4-5 years. Cloud PLM was one...

11 December, 2015

Onshape Inc made a next step in the development of cloud CAD system with the announcement of commercial release and...

27 May, 2019

PLM industry has a problem. It called legacy data migrations and updates. The stories about migrating data and systems are...

2 June, 2018

Yesterday, I shared my thoughts about PLM “Always be competitive” that was triggered by blog article of Sami Grönstrand of...

2 April, 2023

PLM Conferences are coming back in 2023 and I started to put them back on my calendar. You can watch...

Blogroll

To the top