A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Integration is still the major challenge in PLM adoption

Integration is still the major challenge in PLM adoption
Oleg
Oleg
30 November, 2014 | 2 min for reading

data-silos

I want to continue the discussion about data ownership and synchronization between islands of information in a company. EBOM and MBOM synchronization I mentioned in my previous post is probably the most typical one. But there are many others. Supply chain, contract manufacturing, regulation, customer support and services – this is only very short list where data stays under control of different systems. Even the idea of pulling data under a control of single system was an option a decade ago, my hunch that these days, the idea of PLM one big silo is getting less popular.

Control Engineering Asia published an article Hitachi Sunway Talks PLM Opportunities and Developments. Thammaya Chuay-iam of Hitachi Sunway Information Systems in Tailand, shared his thoughts about some of the major trends happening in the PLM sector in Asia, the opportunities and challenges. One of the topics caught my attention. It was specifically related to the issue of integration. Here is my favorite passage:

[Q] What are the biggest challenges being faced by manufacturers when it comes to their PLM activities? [A] Even though PLM initiatives within global companies have developed significantly over the years, the core challenge of the manufacturing industry remains the ever-growing need for consistent integration between PLM solutions and other enterprise systems. Another challenge is the need for focused solutions that address the needs of targeted groups within the PLM environment.

It made me think again about integration topic. The problem is here for the last 20-25 years. In many situations, the solutions companies are using remain unchanged for decades. It is brutal export/import/sync of data. It brings complexity and it cost money.

What is my conclusion? I guess the fundamental idea of “data pumping” between different systems should be replaced by something better. I’ve been touching it in my post about data ownership and data sharing. Web technologies can give us a better way to share, link and intertwine data. I believe it can be a better way and it will replace brutal data synchronization. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 August, 2014

Continue the topic of efficient communication started yesterday about future of the email for engineers, I want to speak about...

7 April, 2018

Earlier this week Stan Przybylinski of CIMdata presented 2018 PLM market analysis results at CIMdata 2018 industry and market forum...

22 June, 2016

When customers don’t purchase product or services, the typical assumption that sales lost to their competitor. But in reality, the...

28 March, 2013

Are you reading whitepapers these days? Hmm… Not much you can say, probably. I’m reading blogs, twitter streams and use...

9 March, 2018

One of the advantages of living in Boston area is to be surrounded by CAD and PLM companies. Long time...

17 March, 2016

Communication is one of the most challenging aspects of our work. My favorite quote and mantra about communication – you...

5 July, 2010

Last week I wrote about PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of my conclusions was that PLM Open Source...

18 June, 2022

I’ve been following Autodesk PLM development for the last decade. It has many turns during that time- from ignoring PLM...

4 December, 2018

PLM universe is buzzing after $70M investment that Goldman Sachs put in Aras.  Check my earlier article – Does Aras...

Blogroll

To the top