A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Integration is still the major challenge in PLM adoption

Integration is still the major challenge in PLM adoption
Oleg
Oleg
30 November, 2014 | 2 min for reading

data-silos

I want to continue the discussion about data ownership and synchronization between islands of information in a company. EBOM and MBOM synchronization I mentioned in my previous post is probably the most typical one. But there are many others. Supply chain, contract manufacturing, regulation, customer support and services – this is only very short list where data stays under control of different systems. Even the idea of pulling data under a control of single system was an option a decade ago, my hunch that these days, the idea of PLM one big silo is getting less popular.

Control Engineering Asia published an article Hitachi Sunway Talks PLM Opportunities and Developments. Thammaya Chuay-iam of Hitachi Sunway Information Systems in Tailand, shared his thoughts about some of the major trends happening in the PLM sector in Asia, the opportunities and challenges. One of the topics caught my attention. It was specifically related to the issue of integration. Here is my favorite passage:

[Q] What are the biggest challenges being faced by manufacturers when it comes to their PLM activities? [A] Even though PLM initiatives within global companies have developed significantly over the years, the core challenge of the manufacturing industry remains the ever-growing need for consistent integration between PLM solutions and other enterprise systems. Another challenge is the need for focused solutions that address the needs of targeted groups within the PLM environment.

It made me think again about integration topic. The problem is here for the last 20-25 years. In many situations, the solutions companies are using remain unchanged for decades. It is brutal export/import/sync of data. It brings complexity and it cost money.

What is my conclusion? I guess the fundamental idea of “data pumping” between different systems should be replaced by something better. I’ve been touching it in my post about data ownership and data sharing. Web technologies can give us a better way to share, link and intertwine data. I believe it can be a better way and it will replace brutal data synchronization. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 July, 2011

Think about enterprise software and collaboration. I think, collaboration is boring. It is complicated, requires lots of system configuration and...

13 November, 2017

I’m at Autodesk University (AU) 2017 this week getting ready to a marathon of keynote presentations, sessions, discussions, meetings. To...

9 July, 2021

Each period in history brings its own power. Back in the 17th century, during Dutch Golden Age, the value of...

28 February, 2021

Monica Schnitger is asking a question about SaaS dominance in PLM following the PTC acquisition of Arena Solutions. Check her...

21 January, 2016

PLM was born as a solution for large companies. The complexity of enterprise product development, engineering, manufacturing and supply chain...

12 September, 2013

I want to continue the topic of design interaction started in my CAD and Design Interaction: 50 years in 3...

13 October, 2014

  There is one thing that seems make everyone interested and listen carefully these days – online communities. To build...

22 November, 2017

This is a bad day to be a turkey. Thanksgiving is coming and it means mass murdering of turkey population....

14 December, 2020

Last month I attended CIMdata virtual event 2020 PDT and PLM Roadmap. I’m still slowly skimming the slides and connecting...

Blogroll

To the top