A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The complexity of PLM business models

The complexity of PLM business models
Oleg
Oleg
5 February, 2015 | 3 min for reading

business-model-complexity

I’ve been blogging about future of PLM licensing earlier this month. It sparked few interesting discussions online and offline. One of the topic I captured out of these discussion was related to relationships between different players in a business model. In some situations, relationships are simple and easy. You have suppliers and consumers. Consumers are paying to suppliers for products or services. Simple… However, the real life is much more complicated. In many cases, there is no direct connection between suppliers and consumers. Even more, modern business models can have more than one level of relationships. Simple example – Google. As a customer of “search” product, we use Google for free. However, companies and individuals are paying Google for advertising. Even more, Google is in business to sell advertising to companies using Google sales channel.

It made me think about complexity of PLM business models. I ended up drawing a following diagram, which contains “players” involved into typical PLM business.

plm-business-model-landscape-1

Here is a  question – do you think I missed any player? Originally, I put 3 main groups – Customer, Partners and Vendors. After some additional thoughts, I added Community. The importance of communities is growing these days and, often plays a significant role in overall business schema.  Here are some  explanations about each group:

1. Customers. If you think about typical manufacturing company, you can figure out multiple players – engineers (end users of PLM products), budget owners (for example, CIO), Exec sponsor (somebody from upper management, who is responsible for PLM program) and PLM team (you can often see a group of people responsible for PLM system deployment). Sometimes they are aligned, but sometimes, they might have different interests.

2. Partners. In many situations, companies are using partners for different reasons – indirect sales, implementation services, etc. It is not unusual for company to hire independent consultants to help with decision making or strategy. Implementation services can come from vendor, but also can be provided by independent company.

3. Vendors. There are multiple vendors involved into PLM system deployment. Of course, it starts from software vendors for CAD, PDM, PLM. Companies are often working with multiple vendors, IT/Software vendors are selling other enterprise software – databases, information systems, ERP, CRM and other enterprise software. Hardware vendors, obviously, is in business of selling computing resources. In modern eco-system, you can see new type of vendors – IaaS provder (Amazon is an example of public cloud IaaS). However, sometimes, IaaS provider can be provider of hosting computing services.

What is my conclusion? PLM business models are complex and composed of multiple players and relationships between them. To make it work is not a simple task. To make it profitable is even more complex goal. PLM vendors are operating in an existing eco-system of customers, partners and other players. This eco-system was mainly created as a result of years of relationship building between vendors, companies and partners. My hunch, customers are thinking about some sort of “re-imagining” and refresh, which is driven by new business models and trends. It is a time to think and ask right questions how to do it. I can see vendors are coming with additional services, subscriptions and other business initiatives. A good start, but what will come next?  Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

photo credit: Money fight via photopin (license)

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 December, 2014

There is no shortage of talks about IoT these days. CAD and PLM vendors included. While each company is developing...

28 October, 2013

SharePoint is a long debated topic in PLM ecosystem. Starting from the early success of SharePoint back in 2006-2007, many...

5 March, 2010

I had the chance to read Jim Brown’s post about SAP achievements in PLM. As usual, when PLM and ERP...

3 February, 2017

There is no secrets – traditional PLM systems are running on top of relational databases systems. Although I didn’t find...

24 September, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended the CIMdata PLM forum. You can find my first article with comments here – PLM...

13 July, 2010

This week I am launching my new web site Beyond PLM. I started my first blog Daily PLM Think Tank on plmtwine.com...

21 June, 2010

My post “How To Manage ECO Without Paying $1’500 Per Seat” raised a very interesting discussion on Zero-Waite State blog...

14 March, 2017

To implement PLM isn’t an easy project. Especially when it comes to large PLM implementations going beyond document management control...

10 August, 2018

In the pre-digital world of the last 100 years, oil was one of the main sources of conflict. Multiple articles...

Blogroll

To the top