A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Inertia is still a major problem in PLM adoption

Inertia is still a major problem in PLM adoption
Oleg
Oleg
8 June, 2015 | 3 min for reading

intertia-plm-implementations

The adoption of PLM is a tricky question. I use a term PLM for the moment, to describe both tools and processes needed for PLM adoption. Here is the thing, regardless on what tools are you using you do have PLM processes in place. You might have bad processes in place, but you clearly have some processes in place to insure a company is shipping products. It is more complicated with tools. Excel is probably one of the most widely adopted PLM tools. The visible simplicity and flexibility of Excel makes is easy to adopt and use. It is getting messy later, so company is keeping “Chief Excel Officer” to handle their messy excels. But… the rational of Excel (or spreadsheets) is clear – this is a tool that easy to adopt and use.

Even PLM industry made a significant step towards simplicity and usability for the last few years, the situation is still far from ideal. PLM concept is not easy to grasp and it takes time and a lot of effort to make company to agree how to use PLM system, to create an abstraction models and implement it using one of the available PLM technologies and tools.

In my blog last week – How PLM vendors can compete with manufacturing status-quo I raised the point of “inertia” as one of the key element in PLM competition. For many manufacturing companies to keep status quo is an easier decision rather than to start PLM implementations.

Sourcing Journal article Can PLM Systems Help Apparel Companies Catch Up With Fast Fashion? brings some interesting examples of inertia and how fashion industry companies are adopting new technologies. Here is my favorite passage from the article:

But the fashion industry is notoriously slow to invest in practical technology and a large majority of companies are happy for each department to rely on spreadsheets to manage their day-to-day operations. McKee argued against this practice, “There’s no structure. You don’t know where you stand. You don’t know if the head of sales or the president has suggested a budget. You never have a good idea where you stand against your goal.” Given all the technology that exists today, McKee said there’s no reason apparel companies should still be conducting their businesses that way.

So why are they? “The reasons vary from company to company but from a creative standpoint very often we find that creative people, designers in particular, sometimes can be technology averse,” offered Luis Velazquez, a business consultant for Lectra North America, which unveiled the latest version of its PLM software in March, an iteration that focuses heavily on collection planning and calendar management. “What we find sometimes is if you have a more experienced design team that’s only ever sketched by hand, there can be some pushback when you try moving them to a digital platform.”

People are using existing tools because of their existing habits. New tools require new skills. Learning curve is slow and daily operation is sucking energy. After all, the goal of manufacturing companies is to produce products and not to implement PLM. Successful PLM implementations are usually relying on local company talents and visionary individuals that creating spirit of innovation in engineering software tools.

What is my conclusion? PLM still needs a push to be implemented. It is hard to convince people to change their behaviors and adopt new processes and tools. You can often hear about complexity of business process changes. In practice it might be just inertia of people to change from Excel spreadsheet to another PLM tool. To conventional wisdom of PLM community is to bring consulting and advisors to help companies with education and forming PLM implementation strategies. Nothing wrong with that approach, but… Maybe as an alternative, PLM vendors can think about better tools that will help people to overcome their bad habits and change the way they work. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 March, 2014

I’m following strategic visions of the major PLM vendors 2014+ publication by Jim Brown – well known analyst and my blogging...

5 June, 2022

Earlier last week, I shared my perspective on how I see the future of post-monolithic PLM systems. If you missed...

17 September, 2010

I’ve been attending Technia PLM Innovation Forum early this week in Stockholm. My conclusion from this forum is that all...

9 April, 2016

I’m attending The Congress on the Future of Engineering Software (COFES 2016) these days in Scottsdale, AZ. COFES is the engineering...

30 September, 2010

We are in the middle of a very interesting process of digitalizing our life. We are moving more and more...

2 June, 2017

Data is a new oil. You can hear it more often these days. In one of my earlier blogs, I...

16 July, 2012

For many years, Microsoft and Office were 100% associated with PC. Not any more. If you follow earlier news from...

22 May, 2013

Collaboration. Magic and one of the most confusing words. People are using it in so many contexts that it became...

7 June, 2020

In my What is PLM Circa 2020s article, I talk about how I see the future of PLM development. The...

Blogroll

To the top