A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Nobody wants to use PLM products and it’s okay…

Nobody wants to use PLM products and it’s okay…
Oleg
Oleg
18 January, 2016 | 3 min for reading

plm-product-simplicity

Over the many years of building enterprise systems, I have come to appreciate that building software product that is defined and differentiated by its simplicity is very hard.  It takes time, knowledge, talent and a lot of work to create simplicity. I want to come back and talk about simplicity in PLM. I recalled one of my very old blogs – How to make PLM less complicated and more user friendly? I was wrong…

I think, PLM products are better these days than 6 years ago. But, here is the thing – although vendors put a lot of effort to improve user interface (or how we say today user experience), we are missing the goal. And the key thing is here – we are trying to make it more user friendly. Instead of that, we need to think how to eliminate products or specific functionalities.

I was doing some user design work over the weekend. My attention was caught by the Smashing magazine article – Nobody Wants To Use Your Product. The article speaks about building for result – product design trend that eliminating specific functions from users’ horizons. Few examples to demonstrate what does it mean – Nest thermostat, which takes care to learn how to adjust temperature; Dropbox, which just syncing your files; Google search results, which is extracting information from other sites for you; Amazon dash button, which simplify ordering of products online; App store updates, which doesn’t require users to perform updates.

Here is my favorite passage explaining that:

This difference in approach — building for features versus building for result — can be seen in numerous products today, both digital and physical. The main reason why some products are great is that they take the load off of users and assist them in making decisions. If you observed these products from the outside, you’d think that their manufacturers do not want people to use them; on closer inspection, people do use them but in a seamless manner, still reaping all of their benefits.

So, what does it mean for CAD, PDM, PLM and other engineering and manufacturing software. There are 3 directions I’d like to point out as a way to realize the vision of “build to result”.

1- Improve software performance. Think about any process – design, visualization, analysis. The speed helps and makes product easier. Instantaneous search results, visualization, simulation, etc. When it happens, it eliminate “waiting” function in all products.

2- Remove “management” tasks. There are many of these. My best example is PDM check-in/ check-out functions. In many ways, this function was created to move files from centralized vault location to local working work spaces. Is it really needed? I don’t think so. It is hard to eliminate, but new cloud CAD products are eliminating it and making design process more intuitive.

3- Eliminate the need to configure and setup systems. The implementation phase of PLM system is painful and hard. It creates huge barrier to PLM adoption. In the past, engineers had to write software code to configure databases and PLM systems. It is better now, but still – lot of controls, forms, data entry, learning, etc. These are steps that needs to be eliminated from PLM systems to make it easier to use.

What is conclusion? Simplicity was a dominant product management theme everywhere for the last few years. At the same time, PLM vendors are still building more capabilities, more functions, more, more, more…  At the same time, looking back, winners tend to be incredible skilled at keeping things very simple. The focus should not be on features and attractiveness, but on simplicity. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Picture credit Nest

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
4 March, 2016

Time is running fast. It has been almost 6 years since I met Hardi Meybaum co-founder of GrabCAD in one of...

3 August, 2009

My short prompt for today. Two crossing messages 1- Google Inc plans to include support for business users in its Android...

18 December, 2018

We live surrounded by changes and transformations of digital revolution. Which means everything we knew until now can change  –...

20 August, 2010

The following publication in VEKTORRUM got me to review again a book “3D Manufacturing Innovation” by Dr. Hiroshi Toriya. I...

20 July, 2009

During last week, I’ve been discussing with one of my long time friends different types of enterprise systems. Very fast...

5 November, 2019

A single version of the truth is one of the most powerful PLM paradigm development for the last two decades....

14 April, 2010

A couple of weeks ago I had healthy debates about PLM and Innovation with Jim Brown of TechClarity. If you...

28 January, 2009

We are all concerned about how to decrease product cost. This is a top priority of users in today’s economic...

13 April, 2015

Platform is such a lovely word. Software vendors like platforms because it gives them an additional capability to partner with...

Blogroll

To the top