A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Nobody wants to use PLM products and it’s okay…

Nobody wants to use PLM products and it’s okay…
Oleg
Oleg
18 January, 2016 | 3 min for reading

plm-product-simplicity

Over the many years of building enterprise systems, I have come to appreciate that building software product that is defined and differentiated by its simplicity is very hard.  It takes time, knowledge, talent and a lot of work to create simplicity. I want to come back and talk about simplicity in PLM. I recalled one of my very old blogs – How to make PLM less complicated and more user friendly? I was wrong…

I think, PLM products are better these days than 6 years ago. But, here is the thing – although vendors put a lot of effort to improve user interface (or how we say today user experience), we are missing the goal. And the key thing is here – we are trying to make it more user friendly. Instead of that, we need to think how to eliminate products or specific functionalities.

I was doing some user design work over the weekend. My attention was caught by the Smashing magazine article – Nobody Wants To Use Your Product. The article speaks about building for result – product design trend that eliminating specific functions from users’ horizons. Few examples to demonstrate what does it mean – Nest thermostat, which takes care to learn how to adjust temperature; Dropbox, which just syncing your files; Google search results, which is extracting information from other sites for you; Amazon dash button, which simplify ordering of products online; App store updates, which doesn’t require users to perform updates.

Here is my favorite passage explaining that:

This difference in approach — building for features versus building for result — can be seen in numerous products today, both digital and physical. The main reason why some products are great is that they take the load off of users and assist them in making decisions. If you observed these products from the outside, you’d think that their manufacturers do not want people to use them; on closer inspection, people do use them but in a seamless manner, still reaping all of their benefits.

So, what does it mean for CAD, PDM, PLM and other engineering and manufacturing software. There are 3 directions I’d like to point out as a way to realize the vision of “build to result”.

1- Improve software performance. Think about any process – design, visualization, analysis. The speed helps and makes product easier. Instantaneous search results, visualization, simulation, etc. When it happens, it eliminate “waiting” function in all products.

2- Remove “management” tasks. There are many of these. My best example is PDM check-in/ check-out functions. In many ways, this function was created to move files from centralized vault location to local working work spaces. Is it really needed? I don’t think so. It is hard to eliminate, but new cloud CAD products are eliminating it and making design process more intuitive.

3- Eliminate the need to configure and setup systems. The implementation phase of PLM system is painful and hard. It creates huge barrier to PLM adoption. In the past, engineers had to write software code to configure databases and PLM systems. It is better now, but still – lot of controls, forms, data entry, learning, etc. These are steps that needs to be eliminated from PLM systems to make it easier to use.

What is conclusion? Simplicity was a dominant product management theme everywhere for the last few years. At the same time, PLM vendors are still building more capabilities, more functions, more, more, more…  At the same time, looking back, winners tend to be incredible skilled at keeping things very simple. The focus should not be on features and attractiveness, but on simplicity. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Picture credit Nest

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 November, 2012

Cloud is trending, and PLM vendors are starting to take some advantages of the cloud solutions and infrastructure. The most-recent...

5 February, 2015

I’ve been blogging about future of PLM licensing earlier this month. It sparked few interesting discussions online and offline. One of...

11 March, 2009

In my view, open source (or more precisely –open source software) is becoming more and more visible in the business...

31 March, 2024

Last week, I had the opportunity of attending the CIMdata Industry and Market Forum in Ann Arbor, MI. This annual...

12 June, 2020

I’m continuing to digest PTC LiveWorx event keynotes and presentations. If you missed my earlier blog, please check it out...

11 January, 2017

Cloud was one of the main “debated” topic in PLM for the last 2-3 years. All PLM vendors learned how to...

6 April, 2022

Last week, I broke my longest “no traveling” period of 25 months to attend CIMdata Industry and Market Forum that...

30 January, 2020

ROI of PLM is not measurable. To sell PLM you need to create a myth. This statement of Jos Voksuil...

18 March, 2010

The online space influence on the enterprise systems and processes is increasing. During the last year and half, we have...

Blogroll

To the top