A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD user unhappiness and new business models

CAD user unhappiness and new business models
Oleg
Oleg
9 October, 2017 | 3 min for reading

Engineering.com article – 4 Things Users Hate Most About Their CAD Systems came to my reading list over the weekend. Take a look and draw your opinion. Article is touching some pain points CAD users might experience based on the survey of almost 230 product development professionals.

According to the article, The Top Four Things Users Hate About Their CAD Systems:

1- The cost of ownership is too high.

2- It is difficult to import and export files.

3- It is too difficult to use.

4- It is too difficult to find employees with experience in the CAD software that we use.

If users are unhappy, then what can be done to bring something different to unset existing CAD companies from their more or less loyal customer base.

It made me think about cost or ownership as a potential place to make a change. 3 other “unhappiness” might sound interesting, but in fact are very hard to change. The control over #4 is hard to change in a short period of time. Interoperability is possible, but it takes “two to tango” and vendors might not to collaborate in order to be replaced. Although difficulties to use might be a real problem, to change it probably even harder – after all simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.

So, to control cost or change business model can be a real option. Which leads to the discussion about new business models. As a starting point, I’d suggest the following slide I captured during one of presentations made by Onshape – The Golden Years of CAD few years ago:

I found different data point about AutoCAD version 1.0 price on AutoCAD Trivia Quiz: In the Beginning about AutoCAD price: Original list price of AutoCAD 1.0: US$1,000.00. Even $5,000 would be a huge drop from UNIX based 3D / 2D drafting packages such Computervision and others. $1K was no-brainer.

Let’s get back to the results of Engineering.com survey. Solidworks is coming almost problem-less with answers (1) sometimes, (2) rarely; (3) rarely; (4) none to rarely. Combining with the largest market share and mainstream adoption of Solidworks can lead to possible conclusion of relatively high level of satisfaction among Solidworks users.

Slide above is suggesting that 4x price difference between Pro-E and Solidworks and shift to the low cost platform (another 2-3x cost difference) made market to adopt Solidworks and establish current status quo. What can get them out of their comfortable position? Would it be technology? Business model or combination of both.

What is my conclusion? The trajectory over all years was to make software cheaper and easier accessible. AutoCAD made drawing table digital and cheap using PC platform. Pro-E introduced unique functionality but failed to realized Windows platform on time and was replaced by Solidworks (huge cost saving). Next opportunity seems to be laying between introducing software with unique functional capabilities or making current 3D CAD paradigm work for free or significantly cheaper. Last 10 years of software development created a generation of people believing in free software empowered by polyhedral business models. How such model can work in CAD / PLM space? How users can have free CAD software, manufacturing companies can pay by percentage (?) of their revenues and community of CAD developers can use it as a platform to build new stuff?  Which path CAD companies are going to choose? The future will unfold in front of our eyes in the next 3-5 years or maybe longer. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 July, 2009

There are a lot of buzzes now debating future business models of “Free”. I had chance to read Chris Anderson...

10 September, 2021

While cloud and the internet are a way to live and breathe for many of us, the adoption of SaaS...

19 December, 2013

The technology can make a difference. What technological approach can make a difference in the future of PLM? This is...

9 February, 2015

The race towards CAD in the cloud is getting more interesting every day. I’ve been watching SOLIDWORKS World 2015 live...

25 January, 2020

PLM is often called a journey. Once started, the PLM solution is evolving and changing. The paradigm of a journey...

11 October, 2013

It is not unusual to hear about PLM as a single system capable to drive overall product development processes in...

26 November, 2020

How many times, you’ve heard the story about problems with the reliability of SaaS software? It usually goes like this...

21 July, 2017

Big news for everyone interested in CAD and cloud. You can try a browser version of Autodesk Fusion360 now. Bryce...

26 February, 2010

PLM implementations are not simple. At the time when PLM vendors are working how to improve their out-of-the-box product offerings,...

Blogroll

To the top