A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

POWER’BY – the name of 3DEXPERIENCE PLM overlay?

POWER’BY – the name of 3DEXPERIENCE PLM overlay?
Oleg
Oleg
11 November, 2017 | 3 min for reading

How to overlay competitors. In my view, this is a new name in CAD / PLM competition game. It has variations of names and forms, but it is about the same. Decades ago it was about CAD formats, later on it was about how to block PDM / PLM integration and nowadays is about how to provide vertically integrated platform.

The “overlay” game is played by all vendors in PLM space – small and big. Here is an example of Aras Corp – Overlay or Replace deployment method. I covered Aras Overlay strategy last month during PDTEurope event – Aras PLM “overlay” strategy explained.

In my view, Dassault Systemes is also playing an “overlay” strategy. I shared my thoughts about it few weeks ago – 3DEXPERIENCE and PLM overlays.

This next phase in realizing their strategy encourages companies to select Dassault Systèmes’ 3DEXPERIENCE platform as the platform of choice, without needing to worry about how to deal with their legacy solutions, as they can readily be integrated.

In my view, the name for 3DEPXERIENCE PLM overlay is “POWER’BY” strategy, recently shared by Jim Brown. You can get a glimpse of what is that in Jim Brown’s article – Dassault Systemes Strategy 2017+”.

The new POWER’BY initiative and branding shares some exciting news for those that haven’t moved to CATIA V6. Dassault Systèmes is now opening up the 3DEXPERIENCE Platform to work directly with CATIA V5 and SOLIDWORKS. This is an extension of the backward compatibility with CATIA V5 announced earlier. The capability will allow users to launch existing applications and collaborate on them in the 3DEXPERIENCE Platform. The first applications are CATIA V5 and SOLIDWORKS, but Dassault Systèmes has intentions to extend this to competitive solutions including Siemens NX, PTC Creo, Autodesk Inventor, and others. This allows non-CATIA models to be brought into the platform natively to leverage other capabilities, most notably DELMIA for manufacturing and SIMULIA for advanced analysis. The goal appears to be more inclusive and to make platform capabilities easily accessible to all regardless of their chosen design tool.

So, what is actually “POWER’BY”? Is it technology? product? vision or something else. According to Jim Brown’s it is more philosophy and direction rather than a specific product.

I’d probably disagree with Jim. Although, POWER’BY is not announced as a product, my hunch POWER’BY is a name of product information model overlay that will cover all solutions once developed and acquired by Dassault Systemes. 3DEXPERIENCE is a collection of heterogeneous applications that supposed to behave and act seamlessly . In every “platform” integration of existing components is a big deal. And Dassault Systemes has many of them – starting from own products such as Solidworks and CATIA V5, continue with other brands acquired such as MatrixOne, Geovia, Biovia, Delmia, etc and non-DS applications (CAD, PDM, PLM and even ERP tools). To bring them together, CATIA V6 product information model (or whatever other else name will be used by DS) will have to provide a common denominator to align platforms and applications. The model will have to run on top of MatrixOne data model, because this model is a very low level of 3DEXPERIENCE platform.

What is my conclusion? New age of PLM (or PIP – Product Innovation Platform) will take companies to a new spiral of “overlay” development. This is probably inevitable scenario taking into account level of competition between platforms and limited number of large manufacturing companies capable to adopt them as a single solution. For other manufacturing companies, the dilemma of running multiple applications and systems will be still dominant together with maintaining a reasonable configuration of products to satisfy business needs. Cost of systems, speed of implementation and flexibility will still play a key role in how successful these business systems will be on the market. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 May, 2015

Products are getting complex these days. Look on every small electronic gadget in your hands. It is actually combined from...

6 July, 2017

Engineering.com just published an article confirming that small design and engineering team aren’t interested much in buying and implementing data...

17 June, 2016

I’m digesting information from Autodesk Forge DevCon event I attended earlier this week in San Francisco. One of the technical...

31 March, 2009

I’ll start with a disclaimer. I understand that to start a “format discussion” is at least as dangerous as starting...

8 February, 2017

Timing is one of the most interesting and important elements success or failure of any projects. Right technology in a...

10 January, 2014

Management of product data was always a first and most important imperative for PLM solutions. Depends on vendor strategy and...

30 January, 2021

Standards are super important. They provide us a basis for mutual understanding and used in products and technologies to support...

27 May, 2020

Lionel Grealou posted open for debate article – The Place of PLM in the Digital Future (open to debate). I...

8 September, 2010

How to make people to work more efficiently? I think this is an important question. This is a challenge for...

Blogroll

To the top