A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PTC Named the Technology Leader, but what can we learn from the ranking?

PTC Named the Technology Leader, but what can we learn from the ranking?
Oleg
Oleg
31 January, 2019 | 2 min for reading

Last year, I wrote about Why traditional PLM ranking is dead. The article raised a wave of discussion and debates about how to compare PLM solutions – a comprehensive set of tools and technologies coming from giant software vendors.

One year later, my attention was caught by another ranking article from Quadrant Knowledge Solutions. In the evaluation, entitled “Market Outlook: Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), 2018-2023, Worldwide,” PTC was recognized in the Quadrant SPARX Matrix for demonstrating excellence in technological capabilities and customer impact.

Check this article Market Outlook:Product Lifecycle Management(PLM), 2018-2023, Worldwide. The report and research materials can be found here. There is very small number of vendors in the report – top 4 CAD vendors, Oracle, SAP and IFS. Number of emerging vendors are missing. Check the report and draw your conclusion. There few interesting bits and bytes of information about PLM business in this report – so, take you time to read it.

My favorite chart is this one. Revenue split between on premise, SaaS and professional services. While dominant position of on premise software is not surprising, the proportion of services compared to licenses is interesting and, in my view, different from usually presented split between licenses and services.

Another good piece of information is definition of what is included in PLM business:

Unfortunately, article doesn’t give much data about comparison of vendors. It explains methodology, but didn’t show up final numbersha (unless I missed them).

What is my conclusion? I found report is a good source of information about PLM market, but not much relevant in terms of how manufacturing company can decide what product has a better fit their needs. Which brings back again a question about PLM benchmarking and ranking. In the world of 7 gigantic vendors, industry needs to figure out a better way to recommend what solution is a better fit to a specific engineering and manufacturing challenges. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 July, 2013

One of the looongest US weekends I remember  is going to end. This is a time to get back from...

10 May, 2025

In recent weeks, I’ve shared a few thoughts about the architectural shifts in PLM—specifically, the slow but inevitable transition from...

28 April, 2009

There is no doubt a search changed the way we work today on the Internet. Remember how looked for  information...

11 December, 2018

Everyone needs data, but nobody wants to be responsible for data management. I learned it during many years of working...

29 October, 2023

Every business is looking for three things: how to make more money, save costs, and reduce risk. Manufacturing companies are...

4 February, 2010

I want to discuss CAE today. CAE is considered as a technology to support engineers in tasks such as analysis,...

2 September, 2023

I was invited by Domain Systems, a leading PLM service provider with decades of experience helping manufacturing companies implement PLM...

5 May, 2019

My attention was caught by CIO article – The digital transformation debate: It’s about people AND technology. In many voices...

2 February, 2011

I’ve got an email from one of the blogging colleagues about the acquisition of Manymoon by Salesforce.com. Manymoon was a...

Blogroll

To the top