A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PTC Named the Technology Leader, but what can we learn from the ranking?

PTC Named the Technology Leader, but what can we learn from the ranking?
Oleg
Oleg
31 January, 2019 | 2 min for reading

Last year, I wrote about Why traditional PLM ranking is dead. The article raised a wave of discussion and debates about how to compare PLM solutions – a comprehensive set of tools and technologies coming from giant software vendors.

One year later, my attention was caught by another ranking article from Quadrant Knowledge Solutions. In the evaluation, entitled “Market Outlook: Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), 2018-2023, Worldwide,” PTC was recognized in the Quadrant SPARX Matrix for demonstrating excellence in technological capabilities and customer impact.

Check this article Market Outlook:Product Lifecycle Management(PLM), 2018-2023, Worldwide. The report and research materials can be found here. There is very small number of vendors in the report – top 4 CAD vendors, Oracle, SAP and IFS. Number of emerging vendors are missing. Check the report and draw your conclusion. There few interesting bits and bytes of information about PLM business in this report – so, take you time to read it.

My favorite chart is this one. Revenue split between on premise, SaaS and professional services. While dominant position of on premise software is not surprising, the proportion of services compared to licenses is interesting and, in my view, different from usually presented split between licenses and services.

Another good piece of information is definition of what is included in PLM business:

Unfortunately, article doesn’t give much data about comparison of vendors. It explains methodology, but didn’t show up final numbersha (unless I missed them).

What is my conclusion? I found report is a good source of information about PLM market, but not much relevant in terms of how manufacturing company can decide what product has a better fit their needs. Which brings back again a question about PLM benchmarking and ranking. In the world of 7 gigantic vendors, industry needs to figure out a better way to recommend what solution is a better fit to a specific engineering and manufacturing challenges. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 January, 2023

Happy New Year 2023! As the holiday season is coming to the end, it is a great time to share...

27 August, 2014

We love and hate email at the same time. Since early beginning (back in 1962) email remains one of the...

3 June, 2018

I’ve been reading almost traditional Kleiner Perkins’ annual internet trends report delivered by Mary Meeker at Code 2018. Almost 300...

14 May, 2014

Recent management changes in Google+ attracted lots of conversations about social products experience as well as speculations about Google+ social future....

13 May, 2009

In one of my previous posts, I discussed the topic “Should PLM develop its own process tools? “. In this...

28 September, 2024

This week, I had the opportunity to attend the Siemens PLM Component Conference in Boston. It was a a great...

15 May, 2014

I had a chance to read “Google ‘A Million Miles Away from Creating the Search Engine of my Dreams’, Says...

15 April, 2010

I think, Enterprise Software is not simple. And Product Lifecycle Management is not an exception and even one of the most...

11 July, 2021

The decade of 2010 was the time when industrial companies discovered the power of cloud solutions. For the last ten...

Blogroll

To the top