A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PTC Named the Technology Leader, but what can we learn from the ranking?

PTC Named the Technology Leader, but what can we learn from the ranking?
Oleg
Oleg
31 January, 2019 | 2 min for reading

Last year, I wrote about Why traditional PLM ranking is dead. The article raised a wave of discussion and debates about how to compare PLM solutions – a comprehensive set of tools and technologies coming from giant software vendors.

One year later, my attention was caught by another ranking article from Quadrant Knowledge Solutions. In the evaluation, entitled “Market Outlook: Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), 2018-2023, Worldwide,” PTC was recognized in the Quadrant SPARX Matrix for demonstrating excellence in technological capabilities and customer impact.

Check this article Market Outlook:Product Lifecycle Management(PLM), 2018-2023, Worldwide. The report and research materials can be found here. There is very small number of vendors in the report – top 4 CAD vendors, Oracle, SAP and IFS. Number of emerging vendors are missing. Check the report and draw your conclusion. There few interesting bits and bytes of information about PLM business in this report – so, take you time to read it.

My favorite chart is this one. Revenue split between on premise, SaaS and professional services. While dominant position of on premise software is not surprising, the proportion of services compared to licenses is interesting and, in my view, different from usually presented split between licenses and services.

Another good piece of information is definition of what is included in PLM business:

Unfortunately, article doesn’t give much data about comparison of vendors. It explains methodology, but didn’t show up final numbersha (unless I missed them).

What is my conclusion? I found report is a good source of information about PLM market, but not much relevant in terms of how manufacturing company can decide what product has a better fit their needs. Which brings back again a question about PLM benchmarking and ranking. In the world of 7 gigantic vendors, industry needs to figure out a better way to recommend what solution is a better fit to a specific engineering and manufacturing challenges. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 January, 2025

From time to time, I’m coming to discuss the intersections of engineering software and PLM. Here are some of my...

15 April, 2015

Engineering and manufacturing software industry is well known by very high barrier to entry. It is related to specific professional...

13 April, 2016

The number of new technologies developed for the last decade is amazing. Video, mobile, communication, self-driving cars… what else? The...

4 December, 2018

Cloud PDM is the topic I’ve been following for some time. Check my articles about cloud PDM here. One of...

17 April, 2022

Choosing the right software for your manufacturing company can be a daunting task. Do you go with a Software as...

4 June, 2010

I was thinking about RFID technology and how it can impact the development of future PLM software. One of the...

17 July, 2013

Excel is one of the most widely accepted PLM systems. PLM vendors and consultants may disagree with this strong statement....

28 March, 2011

Last week Autodesk made a series of significant announcements related to their 2012 product lines. Autodesk is shifting to suites....

21 October, 2009

Some technology and infrastructure thinking today coming out of SharePoint Conference in Las Vegas, NV. Without going to more systematic...

Blogroll

To the top