A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM buzzword detox?

PLM buzzword detox?
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2019 | 2 min for reading

How many times you stuck in PLM meeting by saying “What I actually mean is… “. PLM has one big problem of terminology. Earlier this week, I came across funny article on LinkedIn – Don’t make people feel stupid – drop jargon (Tomas Bay). I found also original Thomas Bay article here. These articles resonated with some of my earlier thoughts.

5 overused words in PLM marketing

Digital transformation – new PLM sales buzzword

How many people in the world can speak PLMish?

I had my “Thomas Bay moment” by starring at Jos Voskuil slide from PI PLMx London. The slide looks super fancy. But I looked at the slide multiple times and I wasn’t able to understand what does it mean.

I can see a new wave of buzzwords and terminology coming in PLM domain for the last few years – digital transformation, digital twin(s), digital thread, model-based everything, connected everything, close-loop, lifecycle ownership, end-to-end connectivity, end-to-end lifecycle, system of systems, lifecycle data, coordinated cross-value chain. There are many others…

I think PLM projects are overloaded with buzzwords as never before. New buzzword is pushing to the stratosphere with the level of complexity that makes it very hard to understand. Is it a time to take a deep breath and practice buzzword detox?

Here is my attempt to drop complex buzzwords and definitions:

1- Digital transformation –> Use data management, not only email, PDFs and Excels.

2- Digital twin –>  Information about product

3- Digital thread –> history of changes and dependencies

4- Model-based XYZ –> information about product and its behaviors

5- Close-loop –> Automatic, based on information

6- End-to-end connectivity –> Integrated applications

7- End-to-end lifecycle –> Information about product and its changes

8- Systems of Systems –> Information structure

9- Lifecycle data –> Information and changes

10- Coordinated cross value chain –> used by different department and organizations

Transformation is not simple. But I can see tremendous value of PLM simplification. It will help to create a better understanding of what industry is doing and to create much better relationships with customers. There is huge risk in not doing so. By pushing PLM system towards new buzzwords, we risk to lost it completely.

What is my conclusion? Don’t make people feel stupid and drop the jargon. How many times you stuck in PLM meeting by saying “What I actually mean is… “. PLM has one big problem of terminology. Simplicity is hard and another round of buzzwords is much easier. But by pushing PLM industry into a spiral of new buzzwords we can miss an opportunity for changes and improvements. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 January, 2025

“Simple” and “easy” are words that resonate universally. Albert Einstein famously said, “Make everything as simple as possible, but not...

28 July, 2018

I thought it was only confused by Model-Based approach and terminology. I published Model-based confusion in 3D CAD and PLM article earlier...

9 February, 2016

I’m slowly digesting news from Solidworks World 2016, which took place last week. You can take a look on some...

1 October, 2019

One of the most debated topics in PLM (and other enterprise software world) is so-called “Out-of-the-box” system. Long-time ago, PDM...

7 January, 2013

What do you think about “social PLM” trend? I don’t see many cheerleaders of social PLM nowadays. The excitement and...

30 August, 2010

I read the following article “Oracle v Google: Why?“. I found it as a very deep analysis of the latest...

25 May, 2010

A very interesting video presenting how you can track hand motion in the virtual 3D Model. The demo prepared by Robert...

14 August, 2020

I wrote about PLM-ERP integrations in the context of the agreement between Siemens and SAP. If you missed my article,...

12 September, 2013

I want to continue the topic of design interaction started in my CAD and Design Interaction: 50 years in 3...

Blogroll

To the top