A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturing, Marketplaces and Digital Lifecycle

Manufacturing, Marketplaces and Digital Lifecycle
Oleg
Oleg
15 May, 2019 | 3 min for reading

A few days ago, I shared my thoughts about Manufacturing Marketplaces and trends beyond generative design. If you missed my article, please check it here.

One of my observations – marketplaces and manufacturing automation started in silos (eg. 3D printing, CNC machining), but eventually will come to the next level of manufacturing workflow automation on demand. More pragmatic application of generative engineering in marketplaces can be an automated workflow, which can make an analysis of product requirements together with the planning bill of materials and match it with manufacturing contractors, suppliers, standard parts. It can be relying on data about other products, predictability models and other data analysis.

And manufacturing is not only about mechanical design, 3D printed parts, CNC machining, and injection molding. Electronics play a significant role in modern product manufacturing. We can see manufacturing marketplaces are also developing for electronic product manufacturing.

Tempo Automation is one of the companies focusing on manufacturing marketplaces, on-demand manufacturing and building automatic workflows for electronic industrial products. My attention was caught by Tempo Automation announcing $45M finance round. Navigate to TechCrunch article to read more – Tempo Automation raises $45M Series C for its turnkey circuit board manufacturing solution.

The company’s turnkey solution allows manufacturers to upload a CAD and have it turned into a circuit board in as little as three days. Founded in 2013, Tempo Automation’s services are tailored for low-volume manufacturers and include customers in a broad range of industries, including aerospace, consumer electronics, automotive and medical tech.

Tempo’s connected factory enables customers to upload their gadget designs to machines that can be used to build up to 15 different products a day. It offers conveniences like automatic quoting and native CAD files, plus real-time feature extraction and bill of materials validation to prevent production and sourcing issues. Additionally, Tempo’s platform autonomously scans design files for manual entry errors before sending them to machines, and it integrates with component and fabrication partners to cut down on turnaround time.

A picture speaks thousands of words. I found the following diagram describing Tempo workflow

You can ask how both examples (3DHubs from my earlier article) and this one with Tempo Automation are connected to PLM? In my view, both are great examples of new digital processes created by modern manufacturing companies. The uniqueness of these digital processes in the way they combine data management, automation, and business model.

If you think about traditional PLM workflows, most of them are automating manual tasks already available in a manufacturing company (eg. ECO, NPI, etc.) These processes almost never focusing on how to create a new way to do manufacturing business. These are gradual improvements. Important improvements, but still only making the same processes go faster, cheaper, easier. The new and native digital process is taking an entire manufacturing process into consideration. Online access, global workforce and optimization, automation and online resources are fundamental elements of differentiation.

What is my conclusion? The development of online manufacturing marketplaces is a starting point in new digital workflows. These workflows are combining design, manufacturing and business processes together by forming a new digital manufacturing experience. Most of the manufacturing marketplaces are silos today (3D printing, CNC, PCB, etc.). However, I can see a trend in expanding process coverage. The next step will be moving manufacturing marketplaces from silos to more integrated services. CIMdata calls is generative engineering. The buzzword or name is less important. What is important is at this stage, we will see a demand for new  PLM technologies for new digital lifecycle. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
30 October, 2011

I was reading Oracle journal early today. Navigate your browser to read a short article – Which Cloud Service Provider...

9 November, 2012

Two months ago, I had a chance to speak at Social PLM 2012 virtual conference. It is a good time...

11 February, 2018

One of the announcements done at SOLIDWORKS WORLD 2018 was SOLIDWORKS 3DEXPERIENCE PLM services. Apology for extensive use of capital...

21 August, 2009

In my view, there is a very strong interest from PLM community to something called “Social PLM”. You probably had...

9 December, 2017

My attention was caught by the following tweet coming from PTC CEO Jim Hepplemann: When I co-founded Windchill nearly 20...

17 August, 2011

I feel a bit geeky today. I posted about part numbers, document number and numbering few times in the past....

24 January, 2020

PLM vendors are usually proud of the ability to scale up and support enterprise environments, complex product structures and sophisticated...

22 October, 2021

Technologies are simple, but people are hard. I’ve heard this phrase from somebody more than a decade ago and I...

20 September, 2026

Last week was busy for me – I attended Autodesk University 2026 in Las Vegas. Before I dive into a...

Blogroll

To the top