A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The next step for Autodesk PLM – Fusion 360 Manage

The next step for Autodesk PLM – Fusion 360 Manage
Oleg
Oleg
17 March, 2021 | 3 min for reading

Autodesk was one of the first large vendors to announce the “cloud PLM” option back in 2011. Check my old blogs – My first take on Autodesk PLM 360 and Autodesk, Cloud, and PLM. It has been a long journey for Autodesk PLM.

In my blog last year – Autodesk Data Management and PLM transformation, I shared what seemed to be another update PLM journey for Autodesk – not an app, but a data management framework.

Autodesk made a switch from providing isolated PLM applications to a broad vision of data management to support design data. Such a strategy provides tons of advantages by allowing it to provide a strong data foundation for design data and a broad range of interfaces to expand solutions with SaaS applications providing specialized solutions for solving specific business problems.

Earlier today, I found out that Autodesk is announcing what seems to be the next step for Autodesk PLM and it will play PLM under the Autodesk Fusion 360 umbrella as Autodesk Fusion 360 Manage. The new package is an instant addition to Fusion 360. This blog can give you some ideas about what is announced in addition to the name change.

It doesn’t change existing users, which probably means Autodesk didn’t change the existing technical architecture and data stack — just a new name.

… if you use Fusion Lifecycle, you will simply see the new name throughout the product. The name change will not interrupt your workflows and there is no action you need to take. Support resources remain the same as well. Fusion 360 Manage is the same great PLM solution as Fusion Lifecycle, just with a different name.

What seems to be new is Fusion 360 Manage extension. Check more here.  The key element is to manage the release cycle in Fusion 360, which was a kind of gap in Autodesk Fusion 360 compared to other cloud CAD systems (eg. Onshape).

Here are a few examples of screenshots I captured in the video.

It raised many questions in my mind and I didn’t find answers yet to them on the Autodesk website. How Fusion 360 Manage is connecting to Fusion 360 data? Is it managed by a single user or group of people? How data can be shared and updated? How multiple Fusion 360 users will be managing data simultaneously connected to Fusion 360 Manage. I hope Autodesk will provide more answers soon. It is not clear how the new Fusion 360 Manage will be connected to other CAD systems from Autodesk (eg. Inventor) and others (eg. Solidworks). Finally, how Fusion 360 Manage will be compared to Autodesk Vault, which recently introduced a new “mobile” option.

The name “Manage” is not very original. It reminded me of another similar system, but fully on-prem – “Solidworks Manage”. The extension seems to be an interesting option Autodesk developed to provide an easy plug-in option for Autodesk Fusion 360.

What is my conclusion?

Autodesk is making an effort to connect its PLM system to Fusion 360, which makes total sense. It will take PLM out of isolation from other Autodesk products and close the PDM gap Autodesk Fusion 360 had with a new Release Management workflow. What is not clear is how Fusion 360 Manage data system is connected to Autodesk Forge and how information can be shared downstream. It is also not clear what will be the price for the Fusion 360 Manage extension. Fusion 360 Manage starts at 965$ / user/year, which is about twice of Fusion 360 price. Fusion 360 and Fusion Manage together are about the same price as Onshape without the new offering PTC acquired from Arena. So, both SaaS PLM options from Autodesk and PTC are not super cheap if you go with an average of 10 users setup. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital network-based platform that manages product data and connects manufacturers and their supply chain networksMy opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 September, 2017

When you present about “cloud” and “PLM” topic, the question of security was always the one on the top.For many...

2 January, 2012

Beginning of the year is a time for New Year resolutions and “annual predictions”. Few days ago, I shared my...

24 September, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended the CIMdata PLM forum. You can find my first article with comments here – PLM...

20 June, 2021

Last month, I published a series of articles about PLM and ERP exploring the war between both systems for data...

12 February, 2021

3D EXPERIENCE WORLD 2021 was live earlier this week and I was watching a few sessions. Moving from products to...

30 November, 2016

For years, one of the most important element of engineering software was to establish data ownership mechanism and lock data...

6 January, 2012

About a year ago, I published my post – Will PLM Channels Survive The Cloud Era? Back that time, it...

3 August, 2025

It doesn’t matter what you do these days, your social media and news stream is overwhelmed with AI. Artificial Intelligence...

7 December, 2015

Platform. It is a very confusing term. What is platform and how to define it. Is it just about the...

Blogroll

To the top