A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Transformation – What Type Of Digital Thread You Need?

PLM Transformation – What Type Of Digital Thread You Need?
Oleg
Oleg
8 April, 2021 | 3 min for reading

Digital Thread is a new catchy phrase you can hear often these days. Very often, Digital Thread is used by companies today to replace old fashion PLMish marketing slogans. To be honest, I like it and it makes a lot of sense. But it raises so many questions and I’ve been contacted by many industry colleagues and companies with questions about different aspects of digital thread implementations – technological, solution architecture, legacy data, and many others.

In my earlier discussions this month, I found it interesting how companies are using digital threads to solve different problems. Which made me think about some kind of digital thread classifications. While I’m still not sure about this classification in the broad range of the companies, I’d like to give you some ideas about various types of “digital thread” and what kind of problems it can bring.

Complex Product Development and Engineering Data

Modern products are super complex combining a variety of pieces – mechanical, electronic, software with tons of dependencies on other tools, components, and software systems. Today, the products are operated by cloud software services combining a variety of functions together.  The challenge of all tools is to combine the data together produced by multiple tools in a dynamic fashion. We all need to have the right data at the right time. A combination of these two factors is a killer. What if the data you have is distributed between multiple files and databases? How to make use of it. This is one type of digital thread for product development connecting data from multiple system and software sources.

History and Traceability

The change is the only constant that we have. Depending on the product type, you will have different types of changes in design, production planning, field operations, supply chain. All these events will trigger changes in the product data- supplier components replacement, product defects, problems with suppliers. There are a lot of changes and a lot of data. Companies need to cope with the regulations and provide traceability on many pieces of information. How to do so? How to have the right information visibility when it is needed. This is how you come to another type of Digital Thread – managing history and trace changes back to the source of operation.

Maintenance and Operation

Manufacturing is switching from products to services. You don’t buy equipment – you buy hours of operation, you don’t buy cars – you buy miles of driving. You don’t buy engines – you buy a subscription to a specific performance. These fundamental changes in business models require systems capable of supporting them. One of them is a total shift to maintenance operations that now is owned by manufacturing companies and not customers. There is a need to manage data about each instance of the product. The data is owned by the customers and needs to be managed with a high level of complexity and connectivity to other data sources. This is another Digital Thread – connecting data about product instances in real life.

What is my conclusion?

Digital Thread is a broad name for the technology that is capable of combining pieces of information together. While it is very generic and can be used in multiple applications, knowing the specific problem, methodologies, tools, and technological limitations is important to make the right choices of products, suppliers and navigate your architecture and decision making in the right direction. A note for PLM architects working on Digital Thread programs – choose wisely, don’t buy marketing slides, and dig deeper. I’d be happy to help you. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital network-based platform that manages product data and connects manufacturers and their supply chain networksMy opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
9 September, 2024

Over the weekend, I was captivated by an article by Jos Voskuil titled PLM Can Change – Waiting for the...

7 March, 2012

I’d like to continue my discussion about multi-CAD and PDM started few weeks ago. If you want to catch up...

26 August, 2011

PLM 2.0 is a new term that was born about 5 years ago. The term was introduced by Dassault Sysetemes...

15 February, 2017

Complexity is a big deal in PLM. Because all PLM systems available today in the market are crazy complex. Talk...

2 May, 2019

One of the most complicated questions when selling PLM is to prove ROI. The topic was debated so much in...

23 October, 2021

Earlier today, I’ve been catching up on some of the online events and reading. Today, I watched sessions from the...

12 September, 2012

CAD and PLM means a lot of data these days. Thinking about growing complexity of products, the amount of information...

5 May, 2014

PLM downstream usage is a popular and well-known topic. Speak to anybody in PLM community about how to implement PLM...

20 January, 2019

I’m just getting up to speed with my video blog creation. There are so many topics I want to cover,...

Blogroll

To the top