A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What’s Next for PTC After Autodesk’s Pullback?

What’s Next for PTC After Autodesk’s Pullback?
Oleg
Oleg
20 July, 2025 | 7 min for reading

The recent speculation around a potential Autodesk-PTC deal created a moment of reflection for the PLM industry. While the talks are reportedly no longer active, they opened the door to many questions – not just about M&A, but about the future of PTC as a major player in engineering and industrial software. I can hear some relief messages from users who stopped worrying about potential product disappearance and business model changes. Different ideas of divesting and restructuring are also calming down.

Now that the possibility of a merger is off the table, many in the industry – customers, analysts, and partners – are turning their attention to PTC’s next chapter. What should the company focus on? How can it continue delivering value and differentiation in a fast-evolving market? And how can it turn its technological vision, especially around SaaS and AI, into competitive strength?

Let’s explore some of the possibilities ahead.

PTC’s Position: One of the Big Three, But With Its Own Playbook

Among the top three in the PLM and engineering software space – alongside Dassault Systèmes (SolidWorks, 3DEXPERIENCE) and Siemens (Teamcenter, NX, etc.) – PTC occupies a unique position. Historically, PTC has often chosen a more innovation-first path, bringing technologies to market that challenge conventional approaches:

  • Pro/ENGINEER introduced parametric feature modeling before everyone else.
  • Windchill was one of the first native web-based PLM platforms.
  • Onshape reinvented MCAD for the browser-native cloud SaaS architecture.

These milestones are more than historical footnotes; they represent a pattern of being early to spot architectural shifts. The question now is whether PTC can continue this trajectory and make its cloud and AI ambitions resonate with today’s engineering and manufacturing challenges.

From Cloud Vision to Competitive SaaS Products

PTC has made substantial progress in its transition to SaaS. It started with Onshape, continued with Arena, and later Creo+ and Windchill+. The idea is to deliver a full spectrum of a modernized product suite intended to offer flexibility, scalability, and a unified user experience. The direction is clear: deliver software that works anywhere, updates continuously, and integrates natively across disciplines.

Yet cloud transformation is not just about shifting delivery models and charging subscriptions. It’s about repackaging value in ways that are more competitive and compelling. Here are a few areas where that transformation can differentiate PTC from key competitors like SolidWorks and Teamcenter:

Speed and Flexibility for SMBs and Agile Teams

Where SOLIDWORKS customers struggle with old PDM and file management, IT burden, and disconnected tools, Onshape offers immediate availability, version control without file servers, and built-in collaboration. That’s a strong value proposition for startups, smaller teams and SMB manufacturers, but it must grow with customers and increase the adoption with headwinds among customers that will stay with SOLIDWORKS for longer.

Opportunity: PTC can position Onshape as a foundation of a cloud-native product development platform for SMBs – a segment underserved by traditional PLM platforms including DS, Siemens, and Autodesk.

Unified Data Model Across Multiple Disciplines

Teamcenter’s complexity often becomes a bottleneck when trying to scale PLM across mechanical, electrical, and software teams. PTC’s approach – especially if it continues evolving Windchill+ with a more flexible, semantically rich data model – can appeal to companies seeking simplification and cross-domain alignment. But don’t forget SMB tools – modern products are complex even if they are developed by small companies.

Opportunity: I can see multiple opportunities here. PTC can focus on delivering pre-configured vertical solutions that streamline setup and integration across domains, enabling faster time-to-value by combining Windchill and Arena for more comprehensive deliveries. Also, PTC can focus on how to expand the Onshape product development model to support PLM for multi-disciplinary products.

Frictionless Upgrades and Modern UI/UX

SaaS-native platforms benefit from continuous delivery. PTC’s browser-based UI (from Onshape and increasingly Windchill+) offers a fresh contrast to some legacy experiences.

Opportunity: Enhancing usability and configurability (especially with SaaS-based tools and flexible data modeling) can attract users frustrated with monolithic, consultant-heavy platforms.

Turning AI Into Tangible Workflow Gains

Every major vendor is talking about AI, but turning AI into practical, differentiated product features is still a work in progress across the industry.

PTC has a real chance to bring AI closer to daily engineering work by embedding intelligence into core workflows:

  • Design Assistants in Creo and Onshape that suggest modeling improvements or detect design flaws, design reviews, and manufacturability issues.
  • Predictive Change Impact Analysis in both Onshape and Windchill to help engineers understand downstream effects.
  • Automated Compliance Checks during BOM or document revisions.
  • Intelligent Procurement Recommendations in Creo and Onshape based on procurement impact and supplier performance, cost, and lead time available early in the design process.

Strategic angle: Rather than building standalone AI tools, PTC can differentiate by deeply integrating AI into the systems engineers already use, minimizing disruption and maximizing ROI.

Strategic Growth: Organic Combined with Selective M&A

PTC’s portfolio is rich. With recent acquisitions like Onshape, Arena, and ServiceMax, the next chapter is about filling the gaps and connecting the dots.

There’s real strategic value in aligning CAD, PLM, service, and IIoT around consistent cloud architecture and shared data models. These synergies can’t be realized overnight, but with methodical roadmap execution, they can offer a “connected digital thread” that doesn’t feel bolted together. Such a digital thread connects product development teams and companies (OEM-suppliers) tiers and connected portfolio of products.

One size doesn’t fit all in the CAD and PLM business. While DS and Siemens are focusing on building unified product suites, PTC can strategically focus on the excellence in niches – both SMB and industrial. In the past, differentiation between SMB and Enterprise was fruitful for many companies. PTC can return back to this strategy to differentiate itself from DS and Siemens.

For that purpose, there’s still room for selective acquisitions, especially in areas like SMB tools, AI decision support, and systems engineering that extend existing capabilities and fill gaps.

The spotlight will also be on how well PTC can grow its existing portfolio and accelerate using already acquired assets. Customers want to see integrated roadmaps, improved usability, and clear upgrade paths – not just more products.

Market Sentiment: Not About Buyers, But Belief

In the wake of the Autodesk story, speculation about “who might acquire PTC next” is natural, but perhaps less productive.

What matters more is the confidence of customers and partners in PTC’s direction. A clear, customer-centered roadmap is more valuable than deal speculation. And for many users, avoiding massive, uncertain mergers is actually a relief.

Customers of innovative PTC products don’t want to worry whether their tools will be replaced or sunset. Customers of leading PTC products should not worry that new acquirers will turn licenses of these products into a huge ROI delivery. And prospective customers won’t be concerned and turned off by competitors using various FUD strategies.

What Is My Conclusion?

The goal I see for PTC is how to continue building differentiation through clarity and execution. Rather than pivoting in response to M&A noise, PTC is better served by staying focused on a few core priorities:

  • Build the competitive excellence for important niches where PTC can grow and displace competitors.
  • Execute cloud growth with strong onboarding and real customer wins for competitive and white space use cases.
  • Use AI to enhance workflows, not just check boxes.
  • Improve integration and data continuity across acquired platforms.
  • Maintain transparency and trust – especially around product longevity, licensing models, and pricing.

In a market increasingly driven by cloud-first adoption and AI-enhanced workflows, PTC’s opportunity is to lead by simplifying the path forward for customers. While its competitors deal with the challenges of migrating legacy stacks to modern platforms, PTC can focus on building a portfolio that feels connected, cloud-native, and genuinely innovative.

The next chapter may not be defined by a dramatic headline, but by consistent delivery and a sharpened focus on helping engineers and manufacturers do their best work.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native collaborative and integration services between engineering tools including PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 July, 2015

The complexity of modern manufacturing products is skyrocketing. It is hard to imagine a product without electronic and software components....

17 May, 2015

I’m in Dallas, TX for the next few days to attend Siemens PLM Connection 2015 conference. Teamcenter is one of...

15 January, 2009

For many years, data management was considered as something that burdens the activity of designers and engineers focused on CAD...

16 September, 2010

Email is playing a significant role in the way every organization is management today. Organizations are run by emails these...

8 June, 2010

Usually, when we are discussing various aspects of software, we are spending lot of time talking about technologies. However, I...

26 November, 2011

It is a long weekend in US. Even if my day-to-day business activities are not completely US oriented, I can...

30 July, 2012

For many people PLM is associated with Engineering. At the same time, it is not true. Very often, major portion of...

18 February, 2009

I think everybody likes cool presentations … especially when they are about surface computing. So, coincidentally, I had the chance...

5 August, 2010

Six months ago, I posted “Collaboration Trends or Why I Stopped Using Google Wave?“. After Google’s announcement about Google Wave termination...

Blogroll

To the top