A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 March, 2015

In my experience, I can separate all manufacturing into two large categories with regards to what they want to do...

6 October, 2012

I have many discussions these days about cloud PLM with variety of people in different roles – technical, marketing, sales,...

13 November, 2012

If you are long time enough in software business you should be familiar with the term “dogfooding” (or eat your...

26 June, 2014

The race toward efficient cloud sharing of files and other information is heating up. While typical photo sharing application is...

15 October, 2012

Manufacturing Bill of Materials or MBOM. Where it belongs and how to support it right? Does it part of your...

5 December, 2011

Crowd-sourcing is a popular trend these days. For those of you out of sync, in a nutshell, crowd-sourcing is a...

23 April, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended ACE2021. It was the second Aras conference completely virtual. Last year, Aras was one of...

13 February, 2022

In today’s competitive manufacturing environment, data is more important than ever. By collecting and analyzing data, manufacturers can improve quality...

17 July, 2010

In my view, the majority of organizations still collaborate primarily using email. PLM implementations have a hard time competing with...

Blogroll

To the top