A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 November, 2016

CMS wire blog article written by David Roe brought news about Microsoft Power Apps. Navigate here to read more. Power Apps...

20 April, 2018

Bad terminology is an enemy of good thinking. A running joke in PLM industry says that if you ask what...

12 July, 2018

Collaboration is one of these words that always created lot of confusion. For the last few years, we’ve seen CAD...

23 September, 2016

Cloud is expanding everywhere. It makes sometimes very hard to understand the difference of a specific cloud technologies or trajectory of...

30 April, 2023

This weekend I want to come back to basics. You can ask why to do so. With such a high...

26 October, 2024

Last week, I attended Autodesk University 2024 in San Diego. I came to share OpenBOM experience of building digital workflows and integrating Fusion data...

5 March, 2011

I’m keeping my eyes open for everything that happens in the space associated with open source and open standards. Open...

4 April, 2018

Breaking down silos was PLM mantra for many years. I have to admit – I believed in such approach as...

26 October, 2010

Later this week I’m going to attend PTC Lightening Event in Boston. For the last few months, I followed how PTC was...

Blogroll

To the top