A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 October, 2023

For the last decade manufacturing industry made a huge move in adoption of cloud technologies and cloud PLM. From almost...

31 July, 2009

For the last weeks, I have chance to speak with few of my colleagues about PLM implementations and technologies in...

21 April, 2020

Here the theme that bothers PLM salespeople for years. How to get a corner suites people (CEO, COO, CIO, and...

26 October, 2016

I’m planning to come to California next month to speak at Product Innovation conference which will take place at Orange...

28 October, 2014

The complexity of manufacturing is skyrocketing these days. It sounds reasonable for many of us when it comes to spaceships,...

30 December, 2016

Just few years ago “cloud PLM ” was an oxymoron. A conservative position of engineering IT was that cloud is...

27 June, 2018

OpenBOM is a company I co-founded almost three years ago. You probably remember my blog  about OpenBOM, but if you...

15 July, 2010

The question of identification is probably of the most complicated and always raises lots of interest. I had a chance...

4 August, 2014

The speed of data creation is amazing these days. According to the last IBM research, 90% of the data in...

Blogroll

To the top