A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 July, 2013

Touch interface is changing the way we work and think. You can see it everywhere these days. Engineers are not...

9 September, 2010

I had a chance to read AESSIS blog post – Why Some People Don’t Like PLM? Graham started absolutely important...

9 December, 2013

CAD, Cloud, Browser…  Since SolidWorks first started CAD in the cloud debates by making SolidWorks in the cloud announcement back...

3 December, 2017

Siemens PLM made some waves in PLM and IoT world last week by announcing availability of Siemens MindSphere platform for...

23 June, 2010

I had chance to have a talk with David Siegel, entrepreneur, speaker and the author of a new book “Pull“....

14 August, 2013

You probably remember my earlier post – PLM cloud concerns and dropbox reality for engineers. My hunch of the corporate reality...

22 September, 2011

Things are busy for me this week. It is mostly because of Autodesk Forum in Moscow. I’ve been invited to...

1 March, 2012

BAM…BAM…BAM… Finally, it happened. Autodesk PLM 360 is here. It was a long run for Autodesk to converge from the...

6 February, 2014

To implement PLM is a process and change. Speak to anyone in engineering and manufacturing community and they will bring...

Blogroll

To the top