A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 July, 2014

Cloud storage is changing fast these days. From relatively small portion of our life limited mostly by online email, cloud...

12 March, 2023

ChatGPT and AI topics are trending in the industry. The technology is fascinating and everyone is trying to taste it...

6 June, 2017

I spent last two days attending Digital Factory and FUZE conferences organized by Formlabs and Desktop Metal – both Boston based...

31 July, 2015

Have you heard about hackathons? According to wikipedia, hackathon or “hack days” is an event where software engineers including designers,...

15 July, 2023

The question “PLM vs ERP” is often coming when I’m talking to companies, or people solving engineering and manufacturing process...

28 May, 2010

I had chance to read a very interesting blog by Fracois Guillaumin related to SOA and PLM. He writes about roots...

23 October, 2009

I’d like to share some of my initial thoughts about SharePoint 2010 technologies presented by Microsoft during this week. This...

17 January, 2013

I suggest you an experiment. Invite two engineers and ask them to provide a definition for some of PDM/PLM related...

24 June, 2010

I read Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt – Chrysler’s Engineering Software Shift. In the competitive world of...

Blogroll

To the top