A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 May, 2019

A few days ago, I shared my thoughts about Manufacturing Marketplaces and trends beyond generative design. If you missed my...

3 March, 2015

Cloud and CAD are probably getting to the point where it starts become a real thing. Autodesk Fusion360, Onshape, SolidWork...

3 August, 2023

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) is a transformative approach that, if implemented properly, can provide immense value to any engineering team...

18 December, 2009

Siemens’s blog post by Nik Pakvasa and following discussion drove me to put my thoughts in the this direction- how...

24 October, 2012

IP (Intellectual Property) is the term used by PLM very often. You probably had a chance to hear about IP...

7 December, 2012

Last week, I followed Gilbane Conference Boston online. Navigate here to dig for more info. Gilbane conference focus is content,...

27 January, 2017

Unless you lived under the rock for the last few years, you’ve heard words IaaS, PaaS and SaaS at least...

11 January, 2017

Cloud was one of the main “debated” topic in PLM for the last 2-3 years. All PLM vendors learned how to...

1 February, 2025

Martin Eigner’s recent post, 40 Years of PDM/PLM: The Status Quo and the Future (LinkedIn post), caught my attention earlier...

Blogroll

To the top