A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 November, 2009

Reading over the weekend ZDNet post, “Why IT cannot seem to deliver measurable productivity”, I started to think about how...

18 March, 2023

Let’s continue the conversation about PLM and AI that started last week. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Chat GPT have been...

6 November, 2013

Engineering software has a long history of aggregation and disaggregation. In CAD, it was long time about new features vendors...

19 December, 2011

Blogosphere and other literature are full of remarks about companies that stuck in different phases of PLM process. You probably...

4 February, 2019

Welcome to another weekly update about my BOM Musings video blog. I started this week with a video explaining when...

29 May, 2009

I’ve been playing with Microsoft Vine Beta last few days. For me this is sort of contextual collaboration. You can put...

3 September, 2021

Every manufacturing company now is a software company. I’ve heard this statement a few years ago from one of our...

8 March, 2015

I’ve been doing lots of reading today. So, I decided to share some of them related to business strategies, sales,...

24 April, 2009

I’m getting back to the topic of persistent storage of PLM data. In my previous posts, I touched on this...

Blogroll

To the top