A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 June, 2024

In the world of engineering and manufacturing, data integration is paramount. As industries evolve towards more interconnected systems, choosing the...

3 January, 2021

The year 2021 is finally here. I’ve been taking some time off, to think about what we learned in 2020...

9 February, 2017

Sometimes things are happening in a very unexpected way. And the news about Carl Bass stepping down as Autodesk CEO...

18 December, 2009

Siemens’s blog post by Nik Pakvasa and following discussion drove me to put my thoughts in the this direction- how...

25 October, 2012

I’m in Atlanta these days attending PLM Innovation Americas conference. Today is the first day, and I’m still expecting many...

13 February, 2025

Have you ever found yourself doing something just because it’s the way you’ve always done it? No real thought, no...

12 August, 2016

Flexibility was one of the key elements always demanded by engineering and manufacturing applications. The diversity of requirements is high...

2 January, 2023

The year 2022 is in the books, New Year celebrations are over, and now is a good time to reflect...

17 August, 2010

I want to continue the discussion started last week in my post ‘PDM vs. PLM: A Data Perspective‘. Thank you...

Blogroll

To the top