A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Back to basics: Should PLM Take Control of Your BOMs?

Back to basics: Should PLM Take Control of Your BOMs?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 December, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I got a comment on my blog yesterday stating “back to basics”. Why do we discuss advanced stuff at the time very basic issues are still open and require our attention? At the same time, I had chance to see Arena’s web site is stating about “control of the BOMs”.

So I decide to ask you – should PLM take control of the Bill of Materials in the organization?

In the past, I discussed various topics related to Bill of Materials. If you are new on my blog, you may consider to check the following posts:

When BOM seeks the right enterprise nanny…
Seven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials
How we can socialize PLM Bill of Materials?
Is it time for a synchronized Bill of Materials?
Improve organizational performance by the management of multiple Bill Of Materials
and some others…

The question of “control” in Bill of Material space is related to the organization of different functional process spaces. Normally, they represented by a different department in the organization. Those organizations that have rigid borders between departments will continue to like an idea of control everything belonging to their department. However, some ideas about horizontal integration can lead them towards better integration of BOMs.

So, there are two fundamental options I can see:

1/ Split Bill of Materials between functional processes
2/ Lean organization of Bill of Materials as a single entity

I don’t think there is a solid decision these days about what to choose and how to manage Bill of Materials. However, I think there is a strong tendency to “lean” in the organizations. Multiple business systems and their respective marketing department will continue their war for market share. For me, the question of “control” will become less relevant and question what you can do and how you get value of product data can be considered as a more interesting problem.

Just my thoughts.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 March, 2011

What do you think about SharePoint? During the last few months, I’m getting this question very often. After my post...

6 August, 2009

I had chance to write about different aspects related to SharePoint and Product Lifecycle Management. Since many of the organization...

8 August, 2018

One of the readers of my blog, raised the topic of PLM for SMB. Long time ago I was working...

27 January, 2017

  ALM and PLM integration and common trajectories is very interesting trend to follow. Back in 2015 I’ve made a...

15 April, 2019

I was attending COFES 2019 last week. Three engineering software geeks – Brad Holtz, Evan Yares and Joel Orr founded...

4 September, 2017

Manufacturing is end-to-end process. You design a machine, plan to build it, buying parts, ship to assembly line to get...

9 July, 2020

SaaS PLM is trending and we’re going to see more SaaS PLMs marketing and sales coming from vendors very soon....

3 December, 2017

Siemens PLM made some waves in PLM and IoT world last week by announcing availability of Siemens MindSphere platform for...

26 May, 2011

In the old days, the focus of manufacturing companies was mostly about how to produce stuff. Most of the products...

Blogroll

To the top