A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Back to basics: Should PLM Take Control of Your BOMs?

Back to basics: Should PLM Take Control of Your BOMs?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 December, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I got a comment on my blog yesterday stating “back to basics”. Why do we discuss advanced stuff at the time very basic issues are still open and require our attention? At the same time, I had chance to see Arena’s web site is stating about “control of the BOMs”.

So I decide to ask you – should PLM take control of the Bill of Materials in the organization?

In the past, I discussed various topics related to Bill of Materials. If you are new on my blog, you may consider to check the following posts:

When BOM seeks the right enterprise nanny…
Seven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials
How we can socialize PLM Bill of Materials?
Is it time for a synchronized Bill of Materials?
Improve organizational performance by the management of multiple Bill Of Materials
and some others…

The question of “control” in Bill of Material space is related to the organization of different functional process spaces. Normally, they represented by a different department in the organization. Those organizations that have rigid borders between departments will continue to like an idea of control everything belonging to their department. However, some ideas about horizontal integration can lead them towards better integration of BOMs.

So, there are two fundamental options I can see:

1/ Split Bill of Materials between functional processes
2/ Lean organization of Bill of Materials as a single entity

I don’t think there is a solid decision these days about what to choose and how to manage Bill of Materials. However, I think there is a strong tendency to “lean” in the organizations. Multiple business systems and their respective marketing department will continue their war for market share. For me, the question of “control” will become less relevant and question what you can do and how you get value of product data can be considered as a more interesting problem.

Just my thoughts.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 July, 2013

Google is making lots of things these days. The list includes search, data centers, mobile phones, tablets, wearable devices, self...

5 November, 2010

Yesterday, I had the unique opportunity to participate in the webinar with a very intriguing name – Why Hasn’t PLM...

27 May, 2021

Unless you lived under a rock for the last year, you should know about the Siemens and SAP partnership. I...

22 December, 2021

Manufacturing has come a long way in the past few decades. What used to be a process that took place...

16 September, 2010

Email is playing a significant role in the way every organization is management today. Organizations are run by emails these...

28 July, 2014

One of the topics that usually raises a lot of debates is Part Numbers. One of my first takes on...

1 August, 2020

Back in the old days, the phone was the primary way to get a report about customer problems. Getting a...

17 June, 2023

It is 2023 and every manufacturing company in the world understands that digital transformation is the name of the game....

8 July, 2014

You’re only as strong as your weakest link. The article Are You Still Using FTP for CAD File Transfer? on Engineering.com...

Blogroll

To the top