A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Back to basics: Should PLM Take Control of Your BOMs?

Back to basics: Should PLM Take Control of Your BOMs?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 December, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I got a comment on my blog yesterday stating “back to basics”. Why do we discuss advanced stuff at the time very basic issues are still open and require our attention? At the same time, I had chance to see Arena’s web site is stating about “control of the BOMs”.

So I decide to ask you – should PLM take control of the Bill of Materials in the organization?

In the past, I discussed various topics related to Bill of Materials. If you are new on my blog, you may consider to check the following posts:

When BOM seeks the right enterprise nanny…
Seven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials
How we can socialize PLM Bill of Materials?
Is it time for a synchronized Bill of Materials?
Improve organizational performance by the management of multiple Bill Of Materials
and some others…

The question of “control” in Bill of Material space is related to the organization of different functional process spaces. Normally, they represented by a different department in the organization. Those organizations that have rigid borders between departments will continue to like an idea of control everything belonging to their department. However, some ideas about horizontal integration can lead them towards better integration of BOMs.

So, there are two fundamental options I can see:

1/ Split Bill of Materials between functional processes
2/ Lean organization of Bill of Materials as a single entity

I don’t think there is a solid decision these days about what to choose and how to manage Bill of Materials. However, I think there is a strong tendency to “lean” in the organizations. Multiple business systems and their respective marketing department will continue their war for market share. For me, the question of “control” will become less relevant and question what you can do and how you get value of product data can be considered as a more interesting problem.

Just my thoughts.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 September, 2012

Cost is important. Period. It drives attention of IT managers and CFOs. With a massive changes cloud and mobile bring...

18 August, 2016

Digital environment is changing habits and behaviors of people and businesses. Last month I was sharing my thoughts how digital...

18 September, 2013

Let say it. PLM companies are going to the cloud. It is interesting to look on the perspective of cloud...

3 March, 2015

Cloud and CAD are probably getting to the point where it starts become a real thing. Autodesk Fusion360, Onshape, SolidWork...

21 November, 2012

The discussion about cloud, cloud services and PLM cloud availability remains hot in the industry. The number of PLM vendors...

5 August, 2013

Brands are important. Especially when it comes to market differentiation. Examples of brand differentiations are around us. Some car manufacturers...

31 March, 2011

Social Media and Networking are important. There are vendors in the business world that are paying attention to the importance...

12 January, 2020

PLM business is a complex discipline and often relies on resellers to grow and scale. PLM industry has many examples...

9 September, 2010

I can see a growing interest of PLM providers to explore the story of enterprise search. This morning I’ve seen...

Blogroll

To the top