A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Process management is an important aspect and activity in Product Lifecycle Management. Multiple activities in product design, engineering and manufacturing can be defined and maintained as a process. Definition of a process is an interesting problem, in my view. Different systems are using multiple techniques to define processes. Most of them are traditionally workflow-oriented. If you talk to engineers in an organization, you will discover that flowchart is widely used way to define a process. You can see below few examples of such a workflows.

We can find such definitions in all PDM/PLM systems. Definition of processes done in this way is very straightforward. However, when processes become complicated, the overall definition of a process can become a bit complicated too. You can see one of the examples below.

At the same time, definition of processes can be done verbally as a set of written rules. Such a workflow definition can be done much easier and can be easy read and interpreted by people involved into people definition. You can see a simple example of such definition created on the whiteboard.

I found both practices implemented in SharePoint Designer 2010. You can find similar implementation in other business process management systems. However, I found MS SharePoint case as a very representative one. You can create flow-based process definition using MS Visio based flowcharts.

At the same time, you can use a very interesting implementation of rule-based processes. I found such rule-based definition of processes as something that can be easier understood by users.

What is my conclusion? The ability easy to define a process is very critical. Process definition is one of the most complicated parts of PLM system implementation. To have a tool that allows you easy to understand and define processes can become an important competitive advantage for any PLM system. I think, systems are evolving and create new ways to implement processes. It will be interesting to hear what are your practices and experience in this space. I’m looking forward to you feedback and discussion.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 February, 2018

Thinking about SaaS application race? You’re not alone. Some companies cannot agree with new landscape of applications. As such, Oracle...

21 September, 2010

Last week I had healthy debates with one of my blog readers about different options to deploy PLM for the...

11 November, 2018

It’s that time of year again. Everyone who is somehow connected to Autodesk technologies and products is coming to Las...

11 June, 2012

PLM is not for small companies. It was a typical statement popular 10 years ago. Smaller manufacturing company is a...

24 April, 2011

I’m continue to publish references on various definitions of PLM. A month ago I posted PLM Definition – Corporate vs. Consumer...

9 July, 2012

I want to talk about the cloud today. However, I don’t want to speak about PLM cloud. I want to...

6 January, 2010

I’ve been thinking about Microsoft SharePoint success in enterprise organizations. For the last few years Microsoft leapfrog in their ability...

14 November, 2018

I have a small anniversary today. I started my blogging back in 2008. It happened back at Autodesk University 2008....

21 March, 2019

I’m coming to SuiteWorlds 2019 in a few weeks. I visited it last year and I liked it. If you missed my...

Blogroll

To the top