A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Process management is an important aspect and activity in Product Lifecycle Management. Multiple activities in product design, engineering and manufacturing can be defined and maintained as a process. Definition of a process is an interesting problem, in my view. Different systems are using multiple techniques to define processes. Most of them are traditionally workflow-oriented. If you talk to engineers in an organization, you will discover that flowchart is widely used way to define a process. You can see below few examples of such a workflows.

We can find such definitions in all PDM/PLM systems. Definition of processes done in this way is very straightforward. However, when processes become complicated, the overall definition of a process can become a bit complicated too. You can see one of the examples below.

At the same time, definition of processes can be done verbally as a set of written rules. Such a workflow definition can be done much easier and can be easy read and interpreted by people involved into people definition. You can see a simple example of such definition created on the whiteboard.

I found both practices implemented in SharePoint Designer 2010. You can find similar implementation in other business process management systems. However, I found MS SharePoint case as a very representative one. You can create flow-based process definition using MS Visio based flowcharts.

At the same time, you can use a very interesting implementation of rule-based processes. I found such rule-based definition of processes as something that can be easier understood by users.

What is my conclusion? The ability easy to define a process is very critical. Process definition is one of the most complicated parts of PLM system implementation. To have a tool that allows you easy to understand and define processes can become an important competitive advantage for any PLM system. I think, systems are evolving and create new ways to implement processes. It will be interesting to hear what are your practices and experience in this space. I’m looking forward to you feedback and discussion.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 April, 2009

There is no doubt a search changed the way we work today on the Internet. Remember how looked for  information...

20 February, 2019

PLM for SMB is a long time dream of PLM minded community. Check articles online to see it is actually...

24 January, 2020

PLM vendors are usually proud of the ability to scale up and support enterprise environments, complex product structures and sophisticated...

9 September, 2010

I had a chance to read AESSIS blog post – Why Some People Don’t Like PLM? Graham started absolutely important...

18 November, 2009

Short alert on Google Labs Releasing Swirl. Google Image Swirl allows you to organize and search images. Official Google’s blog...

11 June, 2009

Short prompt on seamless integration between Google Apps and Microsoft Outlook. We all know, email is one of the strongest...

5 June, 2011

Some time ago, I wrote about future user experience – PUI: Not PLM UI. Future User experience. One of the...

11 April, 2021

Last week I attended CIMdata PLM Market & Industry Forum 2021. It was a second virtual event (last year’s event...

2 March, 2016

Everyone wants to build a platform. It is such a nice sweet word. It sounds well. It smells good. It gives...

Blogroll

To the top