A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Process management is an important aspect and activity in Product Lifecycle Management. Multiple activities in product design, engineering and manufacturing can be defined and maintained as a process. Definition of a process is an interesting problem, in my view. Different systems are using multiple techniques to define processes. Most of them are traditionally workflow-oriented. If you talk to engineers in an organization, you will discover that flowchart is widely used way to define a process. You can see below few examples of such a workflows.

We can find such definitions in all PDM/PLM systems. Definition of processes done in this way is very straightforward. However, when processes become complicated, the overall definition of a process can become a bit complicated too. You can see one of the examples below.

At the same time, definition of processes can be done verbally as a set of written rules. Such a workflow definition can be done much easier and can be easy read and interpreted by people involved into people definition. You can see a simple example of such definition created on the whiteboard.

I found both practices implemented in SharePoint Designer 2010. You can find similar implementation in other business process management systems. However, I found MS SharePoint case as a very representative one. You can create flow-based process definition using MS Visio based flowcharts.

At the same time, you can use a very interesting implementation of rule-based processes. I found such rule-based definition of processes as something that can be easier understood by users.

What is my conclusion? The ability easy to define a process is very critical. Process definition is one of the most complicated parts of PLM system implementation. To have a tool that allows you easy to understand and define processes can become an important competitive advantage for any PLM system. I think, systems are evolving and create new ways to implement processes. It will be interesting to hear what are your practices and experience in this space. I’m looking forward to you feedback and discussion.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
4 December, 2008

Jos Voskuil is blogging about ERP alternative for PLM. This is quite interesting question that can be split into two...

20 May, 2009

I think language is one of the barriers for successful collaboration. Therefore, I’m really excited about a new feature in...

17 August, 2009

I’d like to follow few very interesting discussions that happened last week. Few blog posts you probably want to read...

26 March, 2023

In my article today, I want to continue the discussion I started in Part 1 of my article about turning...

6 August, 2015

The usage of Excel in manufacturing is overwhelming. You might think that Excels and spreadsheets are only used by smaller...

25 March, 2009

We’ve had a discussion about the  future and benefits of cloud applications. Without rehashing the conversation too much, it seems...

10 April, 2011

I read the following Reuter article: Microsoft Toyota team team up on digital auto network. It made me think about...

17 March, 2009

In today’s world, more and more companies need to collaborate globally. In the supply chain, this is a result of...

4 February, 2016

It became a cliche for the last few years to compare everything with Uber and Airbnb. I have to admit...

Blogroll

To the top