A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Process management is an important aspect and activity in Product Lifecycle Management. Multiple activities in product design, engineering and manufacturing can be defined and maintained as a process. Definition of a process is an interesting problem, in my view. Different systems are using multiple techniques to define processes. Most of them are traditionally workflow-oriented. If you talk to engineers in an organization, you will discover that flowchart is widely used way to define a process. You can see below few examples of such a workflows.

We can find such definitions in all PDM/PLM systems. Definition of processes done in this way is very straightforward. However, when processes become complicated, the overall definition of a process can become a bit complicated too. You can see one of the examples below.

At the same time, definition of processes can be done verbally as a set of written rules. Such a workflow definition can be done much easier and can be easy read and interpreted by people involved into people definition. You can see a simple example of such definition created on the whiteboard.

I found both practices implemented in SharePoint Designer 2010. You can find similar implementation in other business process management systems. However, I found MS SharePoint case as a very representative one. You can create flow-based process definition using MS Visio based flowcharts.

At the same time, you can use a very interesting implementation of rule-based processes. I found such rule-based definition of processes as something that can be easier understood by users.

What is my conclusion? The ability easy to define a process is very critical. Process definition is one of the most complicated parts of PLM system implementation. To have a tool that allows you easy to understand and define processes can become an important competitive advantage for any PLM system. I think, systems are evolving and create new ways to implement processes. It will be interesting to hear what are your practices and experience in this space. I’m looking forward to you feedback and discussion.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 February, 2010

Social is hot. Social networks, social applications, social enterprise, social CRM… social PLM (?). I put a question mark, since...

14 May, 2014

Recent management changes in Google+ attracted lots of conversations about social products experience as well as speculations about Google+ social future....

13 September, 2010

Last week I published my visual guide how to choose PLM. This post was the most popular during the whole...

14 May, 2011

It is almost two years passed since I put on my blog a question about FREE as a best future...

31 December, 2019

I’m celebrating a decade of blogging. I started to blog about PLM in 2008. But, Beyond PLM, as a blog...

22 August, 2021

Data is taking a central stage in everything that businesses do these days. You can hear about digital strategies and...

5 April, 2025

I’m kicking off a short series of articles reflecting on my experience at ACE 2025, the Aras Community Event that...

18 July, 2015

One of the topics I’m following closely these days is cloud CAD development trend. To make cloud CAD work from...

22 May, 2018

We are facing new technologies intervention almost every day. While technological transformation is a very good thing, to find and...

Blogroll

To the top