A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing how life of CAD can be impacted and potentially improved by developing of a single CAD standard. In addition, I figure out that I used word “standard” many times commenting on last posts on my blog. It made me think about standards again. Standards are rising so many questions. It always sounds as beneficial. However, standard related activities create too many political and organizational issues. I decided to make a try and figure out if standards are our future in PLM.

Standards and Users
Companies and Individuals can belong to a group that potential may have huge benefits from standards. Your systems expected to work more smoothly, you can move between applications, you can benefits data sharing, etc .. However, at the same time, standards can stand on the way of innovation. Some of them may really prevent people from innovation.

Standards and Industries
I know many examples of industry oriented standards. In general, industry standards may indicate an industry health. The more standards industry develops- the more additional businesses and solutions can be created on top of that. In general, standards can bring industry on the next level.  In most cases, standards that emerged from industries are very stable.

Standards and Vendors
Do you think vendors need standards? The right answer – it depends, in my view… If it brings economical benefits, it can be really beneficial for a specific vendor. However, it is not clear and in most of the case to support a standard vendor need to put an additional effort. So it means additional expenses. In some cases (i.e. Supply chain), vendors can be interested in standards in order of work simplification between users in a supply chain.

What is my conclusion today? Standards are fascinating. However, standard activity is a very expensive. An additional work need to be done by vendors to support standards. So, behind standards, we can see a very simple economical use case. On the other side, users can have benefits from standards. Maybe we need to think about different business models, that less impacted by lock-in customers on their data? Thinking about pros and cons, I’d like to re-phrase my question as following now- Who Will Pay for future CAD/ PLM standards?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 May, 2014

To present product information visually is not a simple tasks. It combines multiple domains of information – 3D model, design...

17 June, 2023

It is 2023 and every manufacturing company in the world understands that digital transformation is the name of the game....

2 August, 2025

Earlier this week, my attention was caught by Forrester Wave report and debates around this. Thanks for Michael Finocchiaro and...

5 April, 2013

Working with engineers is like herding cats. Try to put few engineers in a room and get an agreement. If...

2 May, 2012

The first day of ACE 2012 was quite energetic. This is my 3rd year at Aras Community Event. The first...

4 September, 2015

Just to think about integrations and PLM can hurt your mind. Integrations are complex and expensive business. It is not...

14 September, 2010

I had a chance to read an article by Michael Fauscette “Workday takes the Gloves Off?“. I’m tracking Workday for...

16 July, 2009

I’ve been reading amazing post by Larry Cheng about learning. “Look back 3–5 years from today and ask yourself if...

3 June, 2012

Files. It is so obvious, right? We are using files everywhere in our life. Documents, Pictures Photos, Excel spreadsheets, CAD...

Blogroll

To the top