A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing how life of CAD can be impacted and potentially improved by developing of a single CAD standard. In addition, I figure out that I used word “standard” many times commenting on last posts on my blog. It made me think about standards again. Standards are rising so many questions. It always sounds as beneficial. However, standard related activities create too many political and organizational issues. I decided to make a try and figure out if standards are our future in PLM.

Standards and Users
Companies and Individuals can belong to a group that potential may have huge benefits from standards. Your systems expected to work more smoothly, you can move between applications, you can benefits data sharing, etc .. However, at the same time, standards can stand on the way of innovation. Some of them may really prevent people from innovation.

Standards and Industries
I know many examples of industry oriented standards. In general, industry standards may indicate an industry health. The more standards industry develops- the more additional businesses and solutions can be created on top of that. In general, standards can bring industry on the next level.  In most cases, standards that emerged from industries are very stable.

Standards and Vendors
Do you think vendors need standards? The right answer – it depends, in my view… If it brings economical benefits, it can be really beneficial for a specific vendor. However, it is not clear and in most of the case to support a standard vendor need to put an additional effort. So it means additional expenses. In some cases (i.e. Supply chain), vendors can be interested in standards in order of work simplification between users in a supply chain.

What is my conclusion today? Standards are fascinating. However, standard activity is a very expensive. An additional work need to be done by vendors to support standards. So, behind standards, we can see a very simple economical use case. On the other side, users can have benefits from standards. Maybe we need to think about different business models, that less impacted by lock-in customers on their data? Thinking about pros and cons, I’d like to re-phrase my question as following now- Who Will Pay for future CAD/ PLM standards?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 September, 2010

In my view, “Free” is continuing to pull people. Recently, I’ve seen few articles in PLM Blogosphere that was talking...

17 June, 2010

A very interesting survey result published by Autodesk’s Scott Sheppard in his blog. In my view, numbers are clearly showing that...

27 February, 2018

The last article inspired by presentations and discussions at PI PLMx last week is about integration and collaboration. That was...

4 August, 2016

The amount of data around us is growing and we are facing significant problems to find stuff on the web...

12 March, 2015

I had a dream. A crazy one. Imagine the death of Excel. It is very hard to imagine the situation...

23 May, 2017

I’m attending PTC LiveWorx event this week in Boston. The event is huge and it is just at the beginning....

14 December, 2020

Last month I attended CIMdata virtual event 2020 PDT and PLM Roadmap. I’m still slowly skimming the slides and connecting...

1 August, 2020

Back in the old days, the phone was the primary way to get a report about customer problems. Getting a...

30 November, 2008

If company business processes need to be re-engineered it’s a management decision. Now the question is if we would like...

Blogroll

To the top