A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Top 3 Reasons Why Data Sharing is Important for PLM

Top 3 Reasons Why Data Sharing is Important for PLM
Oleg
Oleg
14 July, 2011 | 3 min for reading

I want to talk today about data sharing. The interest of engineers and other people in manufacturing organization in data sharing is obvious. However, I think demand is much higher than available tools. It doesn’t mean there are no tools that can help you to share some elements or your 2D, 3D, Bill of Materials or other product data. At the same time, tools in the market are very vendor oriented and specialized to support different formats and applications.

What Tools Are Around?

The top question I had been asked many times when visiting customers – can you export data to Excell? The question is not simple, but very important. Customers are looking for ubiquitous tools that can help them to share any data. Excel is well understood. Almost every PDM/PLM tool supports some elements of data share. The complexity is probably another question. However, Excel is the kind. When it comes to 2D/3D, questions become more complicated – type of data, CAD system, purpose of share, precision, etc. – this is only a short list of questions.

I have no intent to provide a full list of data share or collaborative tools. Even so, I wanted to mention few last updates in this space. Few days ago, Autodesk made available their next product allowing instant and easy share of DWF files – Autodesk QuickShare (QS). Navigate your browser to the following links – It is alive in the Lab by Autodesk’s Scott Sheppard to read more details. You can try it on Windows, but as I understand, technologies (webgl) limiting to use 3D on Mac. Another project recently released by Dassault / SolidWorks is n!Fuze. This product is available on the cloud. However, if Autodesk has a strong focus on DWF format, n!Fuze is more focused on SolidWorks files (however, the tool is not supposed to limit usage of other files). To point of one of the tools that not belongs to top CAD/PLM vendors, I wanted to point on CadFaster. CadFaster provides product to collaborate, supports multiple CAD platforms and provides mobile applications as well. Navigate to the following link to see what CadFaster viewer can support.

Data Sharing and PLM Strategies

Here is my take on top three reasons why you need to invest in data – sharing tools and how it can be related to PLM strategy in your company.

1. Decision Making. This is probably the most important and easy thing. You need to have an access to the data in order to take decisions. Project review, Change request, Maintenance, Support Call, Design review, etc. – you better be able to have an access to your information.

2. Process Streamline. Your organization needs to work in a most efficient way. Which means – you need to focus on process and communication. The efficient communication and process organization is the must be here. If you have a tool to share data, you probably going to spend less time in communication.

3. Global development support. The time when all people in your organization were located in the same building is over. Now, people can be located everywhere globally. To have an easy access to the data from multiple places is another must requirement these days.

What is my conclusion? Even if it sounds simple, don’t underestimate the importance of data sharing. Like a lifeblood, data sharing can help you to work or die in a modern product development and manufacturing environment. What should be your choice? My take – the simpler solution is probably better. CAD/PDM/PLM world is full of complicated tools. Choose two factors – format support and simplicity as a first priority. The third one is probably system support. You cannot go wrong, with these three factors. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 November, 2013

PLM and cost. The topic is important and heavily debated among vendors, customers and industry pundits. Major established PLM vendors...

23 August, 2010

Manufacturing company enterprise landscape becomes more and more complex every year. Companies are implementing new products and versions of existing...

8 July, 2014

You’re only as strong as your weakest link. The article Are You Still Using FTP for CAD File Transfer? on Engineering.com...

17 August, 2010

I want to continue the discussion started last week in my post ‘PDM vs. PLM: A Data Perspective‘. Thank you...

15 August, 2014

Part Numbers is a fascinating topic. I’m coming back to blog about what is the best approach to manage Part...

27 March, 2013

The conversation about social software is getting more mature these days. Do you remember early period of “social software” talks....

9 March, 2021

A few years ago, “platformization:” was a hot term. CIMdata was sharing their study about the role of platforms in...

15 January, 2023

Manufacturing companies are looking into the digital thread of data across multiple stages of product lifecycle as the method to...

26 November, 2011

Many of the engineers (and not only) are using Microsoft Excel. People are literally lives inside of Excel spreadsheets. When...

Blogroll

To the top