A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD competition – standard cloud feature list

CAD competition – standard cloud feature list
Oleg
Oleg
5 January, 2017 | 2 min for reading

cloud-cad-features

Once upon a time, CAD system competition was about 3D modeling. Although, it is still true, I can see the new trend of competition – cloud data management and collaboration. Meantime, active players in this competition are cloud CAD vendors. However, I’m pretty sure it will expand to other CAD systems (or Product Innovation Platforms).

My attention was caught by two Solidsmack articles about Autodesk Fusion360 and Onshape. Navigate here to read more – 5 ways Fusion360 improves team collaboration and How collaboration works in Onshape (and 5 reasons you should try it now).

Read the article and watch examples. Based on the article and knowledge of both systems – Fusion360 and Onshape, I’m coming with the list of cloud data management and collaboration features. Some of them are available in both systems. Some of them are unique features available only in one of these CAD systems.

1. Data access on all devices. This is pretty basic, but absolutely important for cloud CAD. Data is managed in a centralized way using cloud database and other servers. Each system can bring its own implementation specific – I will discuss it in my next blogs.

2. Share design with others. A direct outcome of cloud data access and management. Sharing data is a basic thing. But the value of the feature is huge and it is demanded by all users.

3. Live review. The 3rd most common feature after data access and sharing. CAD is a visual tool and ability to view information simultaneously is very important.

4. Redline and markup. The ability to markup is pretty standard. Coming from 2D/3D viewers and combined with social network commenting, it is also nice common feature.

5. Simultaneous 3D data editing. The ability to make editing is one of the most disputed cloud data management features in cloud CAD systems. It all goes back to paradigm of editing. I will discuss it later in my next blogs.

6. Where used and related data queries. CAD system can get some goodies as a result of placing database servers behind the tool. Management of relationships and queries is a good example how to bring value to users.

7. Branching and merging. This is a feature that goes back in the history to SCM (software configuration management and control). Existing branching and merging tools will remind you Github and other SCM tools.

What is my conclusion? CAD competition is coming into a new phase – cloud data management and collaboration. The list of possible and desired cloud-based features is maturing.  It will be interesting to watch how leaders in cloud CAD (Autodesk and Onshape) will be able to compete. Another interesting thing is to watch how existing vendors can play a “catch up” game. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of openBoM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 May, 2011

Ask people about usability of PLM and other enterprise data management systems. From my experience, the answer is simple –...

2 June, 2021

Earlier today I had the privilege to present at a virtual PLM organized by Matrix, a reseller of PTC in...

8 November, 2021

I spent some time this weekend catching up on PLM news and publications. The following post from Jenifer Moore at...

23 November, 2019

Acquisitions are part of every industry development these days. Usually, it is a major event in the company, product, technology,...

11 September, 2017

There is a new kid in the block of cloud-based CAD tools. My attention was caught by LEDAS press release...

13 March, 2018

I have a passion for graphs. After many years of advocating for PLM and product data, I found graph is...

8 December, 2015

PLM implementations are usually taking long time, cost money and resources. Manufacturing companies are blaming vendors for overselling and excessive...

12 July, 2010

My new website and blog is BeyondPLM. The original post is here. PLM is certainly dealing with lots of data...

29 March, 2013

For many years the business model of CAD, PDM and later PLM vendors was structured as high upfront license combined...

Blogroll

To the top