A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 August, 2021

Data is taking a central stage in everything that businesses do these days. You can hear about digital strategies and...

18 January, 2016

Over the many years of building enterprise systems, I have come to appreciate that building software product that is defined...

1 July, 2009

I want to discuss Enterprise 2.0. This term started to be popular during the last two-three years and stands for...

3 September, 2024

In the last two articles, I discussed multiple aspects of SaaS PLM and cloud architectures. If you haven’t had the...

31 December, 2021

2021 is almost over and I want to use the moment to reflect on what we’ve seen happening in the...

20 October, 2024

The world of engineering and manufacturing software is evolving. Digital transformation plays a crucial role in driving the changes occurring...

9 March, 2015

This morning Onshape went from stealth mode into a public beta release. I’ve been using Onshape for the last few...

14 July, 2014

Selling PLM for SME was always a very controversial topic among PLM vendors. No consensus here. I wrote about it...

4 February, 2019

Complexity of PLM systems and user experience is well-known problem in the world of PLM. Even all PLM vendors are...

Blogroll

To the top