A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 September, 2012

I’m sure you are familiar with a famous Apple slogan – there is an app for that. We are in...

21 March, 2011

The definition of what is Product Lifecycle Management is one of the most controversial topics in PLM blogosphere and other...

19 November, 2021

Today’s manufacturing companies are facing challenges that go far beyond the typical issues of labor shortages, rising material costs, and...

22 September, 2017

Industry is transforming these days. As part of business transformation, engineering and manufacturing software vendors are changing the way software...

21 July, 2021

Back in the old days of manufacturing, companies were selling products. We used to buy these products (actually we still...

4 June, 2020

My attention was caught by Jim Brown’s article – Product Data Management Buyer’s Guide (buyer’s guide). The article speaks about...

17 October, 2014

Data has an important place in our life. Shopping lists, calendars, emails, websites, family photos, trip videos, documents, etc. We want...

28 July, 2019

My last week article about How to Measure PLM? surprised me by th number of comments for pros and cons....

2 April, 2014

In my recent post about bill of materials – Bill of Materials (BOM): process or technology challenge? I touched the variety...

Blogroll

To the top