A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 February, 2013

Mobile apps is one of the most growing segments of software business these days. Clearly, the years after iPhone and...

27 July, 2009

Interesting prompt in my view. I was reading Stephen Arnold’s post “Open Source Dust Up“. Some interesting facts, thoughts and...

28 November, 2021

Earlier this week, I shared my thoughts about connected PLM and how the organization of a semantic data layer can...

20 January, 2012

Apple is going to eduction. Bam… It sounds fantastic. Textbooks are on the iPad. I was screening few publications about...

10 May, 2017

In many ways, one of the most important functions in every PLM system is a capability to interconnect multi-disciplinary data about...

24 May, 2011

Ask people about usability of PLM and other enterprise data management systems. From my experience, the answer is simple –...

7 November, 2016

CMS wire blog article written by David Roe brought news about Microsoft Power Apps. Navigate here to read more. Power Apps...

20 July, 2009

I think we are moving fast toward combination of virtual and physical worlds. How we can get closer and combine...

27 October, 2011

Earlier this week, my attention was caught the article Cloud is Dead by Ralph Grabowski. Following some of Ralph’s thoughts,...

Blogroll

To the top