A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 September, 2010

Somebody asked me last week about how I see th future of PLM… Does it look like-BOM or like-Workflow? I...

27 January, 2025

Digital transformation is reshaping the core principles of product lifecycle management (PLM) and enterprise systems at large. Among the many...

24 June, 2014

Product development and manufacturing is getting more complex every day. The complexity comes from both direction – product definition complexity...

10 July, 2019

Aras announced Innovator 12 with a list of few new features and functions. Some of them triggered my special attention....

5 October, 2009

I’d like to discuss a user experience topic today. I think, this is a very painful question if we are...

26 April, 2017

For long time, enterprise integration is one of the biggest challenges manufacturing companies are facing during PLM implementations. PLM integration can be...

2 April, 2025

Last week, I attended the CIMdata event. Check my article and thoughts where I covered the event. As usual, for...

23 March, 2015

  Here is the passage I captured during my weekend reading – We only sleep at night because Facebook, Google,...

19 May, 2017

Integration and connectivity was always one of the most important aspects of PLM deployment and implementations. It was never simple...

Blogroll

To the top