A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 May, 2023

After three years dominated by COVID-19, the world is taking cautious steps towards a semblance of normalcy. And, with that,...

17 May, 2016

Few weeks ago I posted a story about cloud CAD and Dropbox Infinite Project. Apparently it was not only me...

17 February, 2012

Kenesto just did the first appearance at SolidWorks World 2012 in San Diego. It was a good opportunity, to see...

7 October, 2023

Long time ago, I visited a large company building mobile phones. One of the questions that was asked in the...

13 April, 2010

The number of companies and products that are trying to jump into the social tools bandwagon is growing. At the...

30 November, 2010

Vendor Lock-In is painful. I think, customers in the space of CAD/PLM even more sensitive to this issue. Proprietary CAD...

27 June, 2012

If you are technology savvy these days, you probably know what is Apache Hadoop. It originally came to us from...

24 June, 2012

Disruption. This is a word that dominates in many technological (and not only…) discussions. It is not a big secret...

14 August, 2015

The roots of traditional PLM systems are in mechanical CAD systems. As a result, these PLM systems always had some...

Blogroll

To the top