• http://twitter.com/abhijitdastidar Abhijit Dastidar

    Loved the phrase “context is a king”. Well said. It is the whole essence of making decisions in a collaborative environment. I guess it is no longer about not having enough information. In fact, there is too much of information. How you present the right information in the right context?  A lot of money to be made out there.  @abhijitdastidar

  • beyondplm

    Abhijit, thanks for your comment! I think any software company developing application is trying to answer to the question you are asking – “how to present the right information in the right context”. This is valid for smartphones, web applications and enterprise software. There is no single answer- it depends on apps, users, situation, etc. Best, Oleg 

  • Chris Williams

    Vuuch is integrated into MS Office, MS Project as well multiple CAD systems and now even Salesforce.  The big differance I see in what we have done versus a Yammer integration into Office is that Vuuch creates a seperate channel for each document, CAD file or Salesforce item and therefore the communication stream has a very defined context.  With Yammer the integration is really just a place to work from, atleast for now…  I suspect MS will follow a model similar to Vuuch.  When Vuuch is integrated into MS Project a seperate communication channel is created fro each task in the project plan.  We feel that if email is to be replaced the replacement must be more than just another place to type the same message.  That the replacement must organizae the communication for you.  It is our feeling that it makes sense to organize the communication by connecting it to your deliverables, ie make the communication streams deliverable-centric.

  • beyondplm

    Thanks for the comment and explanation! The concept of “multiple-channel” is kind of interesting. The only thing I'm afraid is to “manage” all these channels. If it comes as a list of information streams, I can see a situation when it drives to information overflow. My personal preference is to have a single channel of information delivery that can be filtered, skimmed, searched, etc. One of the examples of multi-channel failure is G+ Circles. I like G+, but I lost the ability to maintain all “circles” (too hard). The same is about folders for my emails (I found tagging much easier). Just my thoughts! 

  • Pingback: Why Engineers Don’t Like Company Private Social Networks?

  • Pingback: Will SharePoint and Yammer struggle from PLM problem?

  • Pingback: Will SharePoint and Yammer struggle from PLM problem? « Daily PLM Think Tank Blog

Previous post:

Next post: