A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: from EGOsystem to ECOsystem

PLM: from EGOsystem to ECOsystem
Oleg
Oleg
30 November, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I just came back AU2012 in Las Vegas. Among many meetings, I had during AU, I attended Innovation Forum – The Reality of the cloud. The reality of events these days that you can attend actively by participating in social networking via Twitter. One of the tweets during the cloud presentation was Chad Jackson’s: – Think about data as an eco-system.

 

It made me think about PLM as data eco-system. Watch Gerd Leonhard presentation- The future of the internet (SoLoMo) futuristic presentation with strange title – Big Data, Big Mobile, Big Social. I found it is interesting. Navigate here to take a look.

Few slides caught my special attention in the context of PLM and Data Ecosystem discussion. One of them is related to Paul Baran research back in 1960 (way before the internet and even early PLM systems). He was pioneering some of early work related to computer networks. Navigate to the following link to read more. Here is an interesting passage:

The pioneering research of Paul Baran in the 1960s, who envisioned a communications network that would survive a major enemy attacked. The sketch shows three different network topologies described in his RAND Memorandum. The distributed network structure offered the best survivability.

Another slide that sticks in my memory was the comparison of Egosystem and Ecosystem. That slide made me laugh. Especially when I put it next to one of my previous post about PLM Egoism. Think about PLM system transformation. A year ago, during AU2011, I was talking about transformation from Database to Networks. This slide is representing the way how ego-centric PLMs need to be transformed into reliable and modern PLM eco systems.

What is my conclusion? Today’s PLM EGOsystems are not sustainable. The centralized approach made PLM implementation weak and not able to survive long term lifecycle, evolution and business changes. The result is heavy PLM systems that require propriety maintenance. Change management of these systems is either expensive or impossible. It is a time to think about data networks and networked system models. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

pictures courtesy of gleonhard presentation

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 July, 2010

I read an interesting write up yesterday in UK Eureca magazine – EADS is flying harmonised PLM. The background for this...

3 December, 2009

Common definition of the process: “a set of activities leading to the desired outcome.” Despite such a simple and straightforward...

15 July, 2023

The question “PLM vs ERP” is often coming when I’m talking to companies, or people solving engineering and manufacturing process...

9 July, 2010

The problem of file conversion is CAD is long and never been easy. Engineers are working in multiple CAD systems...

1 April, 2010

I think, buzzword compliance is a very important when you need to convince the company to use PLM. So, I...

23 December, 2013

For long time, enterprise software didn’t pay much attention to user-friendliness. I can go and bring many examples from the...

30 January, 2015

We live in the era of changes. Think about the impact open source software (OSS) made on the software industry...

31 October, 2016

The perceived value of product lifecycle management (PLM) is to help companies to boost innovation and improve product development, operation...

26 October, 2017

I spent last 2 days attending Develop3D Live conference in Boston. The conference organized by Develop3D is US version of...

Blogroll

To the top