A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Who should be the first PLM user in a company?

Who should be the first PLM user in a company?
Oleg
Oleg
9 May, 2013 | 3 min for reading

Enterprise software implementations are usually not a simple task. Compared to selection of your next mobile device and RSS reader, it is an organizational effort. Enterprise software gets really complicated when it comes to the point implementation requires involvement of people. Product lifecycle management (PLM) is one of these systems. Implementation of PLM is  deeply connected to product development and manufacturing processes. Success or failure of PLM implementation is directly impacted by how people are involved in PLM system adoption and use.

Companies are taking different approaches in implementing PLM. However, fundamentally, I can see two different ways in implementation. First is holistic approach usually called “business transformation”. It implies significant process changes as a result of PLM system implementation. Companies are analyzing their existing processes, optimize and restructuring the way they do business. Second approach is focusing on a specific process or problem solving. It is usually come as an improvement of a specific activity and/or process.

There are lots of debates about PLM implementations these days. The value of PLM system implementations becomes clear to organizations on different levels. At the same time, it is obviously not easy to people to understand how to start using a PLM system that will have such a significant impact of everything they do.

I was reading an Minerva blog post – Should we pull PLM deployment? A new lean deployment strategy by Yoann Maingon. In this article Yoann shares his view on different approaches to implement PLM. The idea of lean and “pulling data” resonated. Here is an interesting passage:

The lean concept is highly based on a pull flow. Most of the arguments I’ve had were about the fact that the main data is created in Engineering so we should start deployment in engineering. Well, what if you should provide a system to the first person who enter the system. The one who will pull the flow, the customer? the marketing? assistance & support?

It made me think about how to maximize the value of PLM implementation withing short period of time. Here is the idea. Every company is manufacturing products for customers in some ways. The biggest process loop in every manufacturing company starts from requirements and ends with “release” of product to customer. To control the loop between requirements and results can be an interesting problem to handle first.

The idea of “pull” will be related to pulling of product requirements and documents representing released products and combined them together in a single system. In my view, it can provide an interesting insight on company operation. It is also very useful information source that every company can “re-use” for different purposes – new projects, customer support, etc.

What is the conclusion? It all starts from ROI. How to make it faster… This is a challenge most of PLM implementations are facing these days. For most of the implementations the process of getting to results can be slow. To provide system that can capture requirements to release control can be an interesting option. Lots of valuable information is hidden in this relationships of requirements-result. It also can drive management attention and focus in a company. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 August, 2018

I’m officially coming back online after a week of cooling down during family vacation in Iceland. Apologizing for absence of...

25 March, 2010

I had chance to read the following blog post on IT Business Edge – Oh No, Social Medial Creates Even...

14 December, 2011

Mobile becomes more and more important in our everyday life. “You don’t have to be at your desk to make...

20 April, 2009

In one of my previous posts, I already discussed PLM process management: Should PLM develop its own process tools?. In...

4 January, 2025

In my work on change management, I’ve been exploring how we can make meaningful improvements to traditional change management processes...

30 October, 2011

I was reading Oracle journal early today. Navigate your browser to read a short article – Which Cloud Service Provider...

30 March, 2012

This week was extremely busy. I was traveling to attend Autodesk Media Summit in San-Francisco. You can read about it...

20 May, 2019

Verdi Ogewell, the Editor-in-Chief of VerkstadsForum PLM Magazine and ENGINEERING.com’s European correspondent publish his next PLM failure bombshells – Telecom...

2 July, 2015

The complexity of modern manufacturing products is skyrocketing. It is hard to imagine a product without electronic and software components....

Blogroll

To the top