A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Thoughts about PDM/PLM jumbos and PLM glue

Thoughts about PDM/PLM jumbos and PLM glue
Oleg
Oleg
10 December, 2013 | 2 min for reading

plm-big-systems-integrations

PDM v. PLM. This topic is usually raising lots of questions. Still is… People are getting confused by names and functions. Few years ago, I wrote 3 posts comparing PDM and PLM from different aspects – data, process and integration. Recently, Chad Jackson made me think about PLM and PDM topic again by his write up of Enovia capabilities. You might read my PDMish, PLMish and other CADPDLM bundles following Chad’s post.

Aras blog is bringing PDM v PLM topic again. Navigate to PDM or PLM? Yes. story by Peter Schroer – CEO and President of Aras. Peter draws a clear functional line between PDM and PLM. The following passage put all “dots” in comparison between D and L in product development.

PDM doesn’t provide product configuration management (effectivity) or enterprise process management. It doesn’t keep the design in synch with product workflows or requirements management, it doesn’t manage non-CAD and non-file based data very well, and it doesn’t track where that part or assembly fits in to the entire system lifecycle process. While PDM is useful, it doesn’t help make supply chains more efficient, it doesn’t improve quality or customer satisfaction, and it doesn’t help increase revenue.

The recipe I captured in Aras’ blog is suggesting PLM to play the role of glue that connect PDM (engineering) and extended enterprise (rest of the company).

PLM, or product lifecycle management, is the glue between PDM and the extended enterprise. PLM takes product data and puts it in the correct context for each user. For some users the CAD file is the center of their universe, but for many others CAD-based data is just a small subset of the entire set of product information they work with.

The last things about “glue” made me think about future integration strategies in PDM/PLM world. It was a time when everybody had a dream of a single PLM system used by everybody in the company providing a holistic set of functions. However, nowadays the number of “single PLM” believers are going down.

So, what comes next? Few weeks ago, I’ve been discussing the idea of Future unbundling strategies in PLM. Thinking more, I can see future separation of giant systems into small services as something more feasible. I can see how small features and functions are getting traction in a company to fulfill a specific need – change management, configurations, engineering BOM, etc.

What is my conclusion? I can see more tools and service diversity in the future. It is very hard to provide ready to go out-of-the-box set of functions. Compared to that, I can see set of services to make product development, collaboration, data management and communication more efficient. Some of tools can be cloud- and some of them – on-premise based. Social platforms will play a role of one-big-system-glue. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 March, 2012

Multitenancy. You may ask me why I want to spend this Sunday morning talking about multitenancy. Well… two words –...

17 December, 2012

Experience is one of the most popular words in tech these days. CAD and PLM vendors are part of this...

6 April, 2010

I found an invitation to AUGI Drops service from AUGI in my email this morning. You can see more information...

15 December, 2013

PDM is not a new domain in enterprise, engineering and manufacturing software. It might sounds like PDM functions are clearly...

8 November, 2013

It was a big Twitter day. Twitter IPO generated an overflow of news, articles, memorable stories. For me, twitter become...

18 July, 2018

Modern manufacturing world is all about communication and networking. Companies are hiring engineers all over the world. Contractors and suppliers...

28 August, 2020

How to provide the mechanical design community access to a growing library of products available and connect engineers working on...

3 March, 2009

First of all, I think we need to clarify terms. Folksonomy is the term used for the classification of mechanisms...

17 June, 2010

I had chance to read Buzz message thread about ECO management, initiated by Josh Mings. I found it worth reading....

Blogroll

To the top