A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD Systems Comparison. A View From Onshape…

CAD Systems Comparison. A View From Onshape…
Oleg
Oleg
13 September, 2019 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for software? Just a few years ago, Gartner was still running it for PLM and CAD vendors. Gartner doesn’t do it anymore. My hunch, in the current state of vendors development, it is hard very hard to pull a clean comparison in 4 distinct quadrants. Vendors are too big and the portfolio is very diversified.

But, it looks like Onshape is filling the gap now. Yesterday, I attended the webinar by Onshape – Comparing CAD systems. The webinar is available online, you can listen and draw your opinion.

Here are few slides I captured. Tell me what you think.

Few interesting comments. Autodesk Fusion360 and Siemens Solid Edge are absent from the comparison list. I asked about Fusion360 during the webinar. According to Onshape, they don’t see Fusion360 users coming to migrate to Onshape. I can see that point.

I found a comparison of Onshape and Fusion 360 on G2 Crowd website. Check it our here.

What is my conclusion? Onshape CAD in the cloud (browser) and embedded data managements are two clear and unique differentiators among many other features. People might have a different opinion about CAD running in the browser. But, Onshape data management is very much unique and can give a lot of advantages for the long run. Onshape calls the cost as one of the reasons companies are looking for a new CAD. Onshape subscription model is probably not very much different from other CAD vendors today. Can unique Onshape technology bring more value for the same price? This is an interesting question I’d like to find the answer. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 July, 2018

Modern manufacturing world is all about communication and networking. Companies are hiring engineers all over the world. Contractors and suppliers...

23 October, 2013

Technology space is good about inventing new jobs, titles and responsibilities. Until now, we knew about CEO, COO, CIO… The...

8 January, 2018

Long time awaited(at least for me) cloud PLM research  made by CIMdata and sponsored by multiple PLM vendors was finally...

17 April, 2022

PLM Events are coming back! After more than two years of virtual events, the industry seems to be coming back...

2 April, 2010

Few weeks ago I had chance to attend WTG Webinar Evolving from PDM to an Integrated PLM system at BAE...

22 June, 2010

I’d suggest to have some fun in the beginning. What is PUI? Do you think this is a new PLM...

24 September, 2012

The issues of data, data lock-in, interoperability usually drives lots of debates and discussions. Started early from support and conversions...

2 October, 2012

Nobody is not surprised how important information nowadays. Actually, maybe it is not true. What we usually do was called...

19 September, 2020

Nothing is more painful in PLM business as PLM upgrades. Historically, PLM implementations took a long time and include many...

Blogroll

To the top