A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD Systems Comparison. A View From Onshape…

CAD Systems Comparison. A View From Onshape…
Oleg
Oleg
13 September, 2019 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for software? Just a few years ago, Gartner was still running it for PLM and CAD vendors. Gartner doesn’t do it anymore. My hunch, in the current state of vendors development, it is hard very hard to pull a clean comparison in 4 distinct quadrants. Vendors are too big and the portfolio is very diversified.

But, it looks like Onshape is filling the gap now. Yesterday, I attended the webinar by Onshape – Comparing CAD systems. The webinar is available online, you can listen and draw your opinion.

Here are few slides I captured. Tell me what you think.

Few interesting comments. Autodesk Fusion360 and Siemens Solid Edge are absent from the comparison list. I asked about Fusion360 during the webinar. According to Onshape, they don’t see Fusion360 users coming to migrate to Onshape. I can see that point.

I found a comparison of Onshape and Fusion 360 on G2 Crowd website. Check it our here.

What is my conclusion? Onshape CAD in the cloud (browser) and embedded data managements are two clear and unique differentiators among many other features. People might have a different opinion about CAD running in the browser. But, Onshape data management is very much unique and can give a lot of advantages for the long run. Onshape calls the cost as one of the reasons companies are looking for a new CAD. Onshape subscription model is probably not very much different from other CAD vendors today. Can unique Onshape technology bring more value for the same price? This is an interesting question I’d like to find the answer. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 December, 2018

One of the topics of my interest is to compare between PLM and BIM. Let me put a disclaimer from...

20 April, 2016

Innovation is trending these days. Companies are considering innovation as a single most powerful competitive advantage. Industry researchers and software...

29 January, 2011

I just discovered one interesting fact. Exactly, a year ago, on Jan 28th, I published my first blog post about...

17 August, 2011

PLM User Experience… Yes, I know. This is a painful point. Everybody wants it simpler, intuitive and easy. My best...

13 September, 2010

Last week I published my visual guide how to choose PLM. This post was the most popular during the whole...

25 February, 2025

I’m attending 3DEXPERIENCE World 2025 in Houston this week. In this article, I’m sharing some interesting updates from Dassault Systèmes...

21 August, 2021

The world is much more connected than you think. Our connections go much beyond your everyday social network posts, text...

1 May, 2012

For the last couple of years, I’ve been following iPad application appearance in the space of engineering and manufacturing. I...

27 November, 2011

The announcement made by Dassault System last week, made me think about a huge distance CAD industry passed for the...

Blogroll

To the top