A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD Systems Comparison. A View From Onshape…

CAD Systems Comparison. A View From Onshape…
Oleg
Oleg
13 September, 2019 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for software? Just a few years ago, Gartner was still running it for PLM and CAD vendors. Gartner doesn’t do it anymore. My hunch, in the current state of vendors development, it is hard very hard to pull a clean comparison in 4 distinct quadrants. Vendors are too big and the portfolio is very diversified.

But, it looks like Onshape is filling the gap now. Yesterday, I attended the webinar by Onshape – Comparing CAD systems. The webinar is available online, you can listen and draw your opinion.

Here are few slides I captured. Tell me what you think.

Few interesting comments. Autodesk Fusion360 and Siemens Solid Edge are absent from the comparison list. I asked about Fusion360 during the webinar. According to Onshape, they don’t see Fusion360 users coming to migrate to Onshape. I can see that point.

I found a comparison of Onshape and Fusion 360 on G2 Crowd website. Check it our here.

What is my conclusion? Onshape CAD in the cloud (browser) and embedded data managements are two clear and unique differentiators among many other features. People might have a different opinion about CAD running in the browser. But, Onshape data management is very much unique and can give a lot of advantages for the long run. Onshape calls the cost as one of the reasons companies are looking for a new CAD. Onshape subscription model is probably not very much different from other CAD vendors today. Can unique Onshape technology bring more value for the same price? This is an interesting question I’d like to find the answer. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 October, 2012

Globalization is a reality of today’s manufacturing environment. It is no unusual to have even small companies distributed across the...

30 July, 2012

For many people PLM is associated with Engineering. At the same time, it is not true. Very often, major portion of...

7 September, 2025

For decades, engineering and manufacturing work has worked around documents. CAD files, specs, BOM spreadsheets, ECO PDFs, slide decks for...

9 December, 2016

One of the complex topics in product development and manufacturing is multi-level BOM. Very often, multi-level BOM is presented as...

29 February, 2016

Selecting of PLM solution is a daunting process that can take time and energy in the manufacturing company. How to...

8 January, 2020

I want to come back to multi-tenancy. Over the past few months, I shared my thoughts about the importance of...

14 September, 2018

Earlier this week, I shared my perspective on cloud adoption in 2018, challenges of single tenant PLM architectures and differences between...

28 May, 2009

After starting a massive Excel discussion last week and continuing this week, I got a lot of comments that I...

15 May, 2014

I had a chance to read “Google ‘A Million Miles Away from Creating the Search Engine of my Dreams’, Says...

Blogroll

To the top