A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 May, 2014

PLM downstream usage is a popular and well-known topic. Speak to anybody in PLM community about how to implement PLM...

16 July, 2018

  One of my most favorite chapters in technology for the last decade is related to graph data models. As...

24 October, 2011

I want to continue the topic I started in my previous posts – PLM for SME (Small to Medium Enterprise)....

25 April, 2013

Are you familiar with term “silo”. When it comes to enterprises and large organizations, we often can hear about different...

2 April, 2014

In my recent post about bill of materials – Bill of Materials (BOM): process or technology challenge? I touched the variety...

23 August, 2012

The discussion about cloud security is storming. You can see it going wide, and everybody wants to add something about...

4 June, 2014

It is not unusual to hear people speaking about PLM implementation and changes that need to be done in the...

5 January, 2015

Products are getting more complex these days. There are multiple reasons for that. Adding of connectivity and software is one...

30 April, 2014

One of my favorite keynotes last week at COFES 2014 took me to the definition of time paradox and how different...

Blogroll

To the top