A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 February, 2016

Part numbers are hard. What started as a simple number and references to a part company usually purchase from a supplier,...

29 October, 2012

The interest to cloud PLM is growing these days. At the beginning of this year, I discussed future PLM business...

6 May, 2021

Modern cloud technologies are a foundation of SaaS business, which in a nutshell means turn software products into digital services....

28 September, 2009

Interesting post few days ago. What is very annoying is the number of buzzwords growing in the enterprise system world....

8 February, 2021

My recent blog about how to integrate BOMs and also the opportunity to have a Single BOM? brought many questions...

2 December, 2015

  For the last 15-20 years, PDM and PLM tools went long way from perceived as an-add for CAD tools...

20 June, 2025

More than a decade ago, I wrote a blog titled “How Many Buttons Do You Need in a PLM UI?”...

20 April, 2016

Innovation is trending these days. Companies are considering innovation as a single most powerful competitive advantage. Industry researchers and software...

21 September, 2018

The importance of software in modern manufacturing product is hard to underestimate. For the last decade we’ve seen how complex...

Blogroll

To the top