A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM develop its own process tools?

Should PLM develop its own process tools?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 February, 2009 | 1 min for reading

There is no discussion – PLM is very oriented towards processes. In order to be able to coordinate multiple organizational activities around product lifecycles it seems like process tools is  a “must to have” component in PLM tool box. But is it really true?

In today’s world, process tools are becoming available as part of many non-PLM products. Starting as workflow automation, process tools were developed and/or acquired by platform vendors (IBM, Microsoft and others). Large ERP vendors also provided process tools as part of their packages. In addition to these big behemoths, many BPMS (Business Process Management Suites) are focusing on process definition, execution and improvement. In addition, some standards initiatives around BPMN and BPEL are also focusing on process management and tools.

So where does PLM play into this game? I see two possible options: (1) PLM providers will focus on the development of process management tools; (2) PLM providers will allow the integration of PLM information and IP  (Intellectual Property) into existing process tools provided by platforms. I believe that option #1 will be very helpful in integrating PLM systems into the enterprise software already available within the vast zoo of software within the organization, option#2 can simplify deployment and and keep the implementation of PLM simple.

From a customer’s standpoint,  I see great significance to maintaining single organizational process. Therefore, a promising alternative is to align the PLM process implementation with the growing adoption of standards like BPMN /BPEL. This allows customer to run multiple tools around the same process…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7K53XR6A1c&feature=related]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFlKuPRpHoM&feature=related]

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
30 December, 2024

In this fourth installment of the “Rethinking Change Management” series, we dive into the technical architecture and workflow underpinning a...

1 July, 2014

I’d like to continue the topic I started yesterday related to CAD File Management Trajectories. The opportunity to use the...

6 January, 2024

My article about building a product model for digital thread applications triggered a healthy amount of conversations. I appreciate everyone...

3 December, 2010

Collaboration is a tough word. PLM Is using this word all the time. For the last 10-15 years in this...

26 May, 2021

I started my series of articles about PLM and ERP by speaking about PLM vs ERP Tug of War, continued...

15 October, 2012

Manufacturing Bill of Materials or MBOM. Where it belongs and how to support it right? Does it part of your...

21 November, 2016

I attended PI OC (Product Innovation Orange County) event organized by Market Key. The event location was beautiful. Dana Point,...

8 October, 2022

Do you remember what is PLM software Release Lock-in? It happened to many companies and it continues to be a...

13 August, 2013

Processes. Every organization is driven by processes. Even if you don’t have any process management systems, processes are there. You...

Blogroll

To the top