A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to Improve Engineering Change Processes using Enterprise 2.0 Technologies?

How to Improve Engineering Change Processes using Enterprise 2.0 Technologies?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
22 April, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I think that using Enterprise 2.0 technologies for Product Lifecycle can bring significant improvement in implementation and services. Today’s traditional approach is to use workflow-based tools to implement ECO processes. Is this good? Yes, it’s probably good, but at the same time, establishing such implementation can be relatively complex. You need to rely on database management tools and process management infrastructure. This is expensive. What alternative do we have today? I noticed that there is an emerging group of software which is starting to be referred to as Enterprise 2.0. Although there isn’t a consolidated agreement as to the scope of Enterprise 2.0 software, but there does seem to be a reference to a group of software tools and technologies that use Web tools for collaboration.

So, a typical, traditional ECO implementation includes the following components: Data, Process and Collaboration. Data allows you to keep information about ECO and link to the relevant CAD files located in a vault. Process allows you to set up a workflow to pass ECO information and requests among people in an organization. Collaboration tools are dedicated tools that allow you to present connected information about change and design to users. Collaboration tools normally include data and visual tools. Most of such implementations today are based on proprietarily rich (windows) clients and web tools. Workflow implementations in most cases rely on proprietary process tools, and sometime rely on IT process middleware. Overall, such implementation requires significant planning of everything – starting from ECO data through down to processes and people communication.

How we can make this implementation simpler and cut implementation costs? First of all – managing of all data natively in RDBM can be replaced by an implementation based on Wiki. This would allow us to keep information about ECO and reuse regular Web wiki editing tools to put information there. Depending on the Wiki engines you choose, you will have already user interface (web like) and data capture capabilities. You can tag this information and make it easy to search using desktop and/or enterprise search engines. Approvals and ECO process can be part of associated Wiki page data and ad-hoc collaboration. To establish more formal process you can use built-in workflow engines (i.e. Windows Workflow Foundation etc.). And last but not least is collaboration. Your environment can be Web-based and use all Web-based collaboration tools, and co-editing web pages. Additional power is that all ECO information can be easily shared as regular URLs. Additional interest can be gained by using subscription models similar to RSS. These can easily be applied on native web data and gives you the ability to use organizational information to discover which people to whom you should connect..

I believe, we are only in the beginning of Enterprise 2.0 tools introduction in organization, but for me it looks very promising…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xKSJfQh89k]

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
9 January, 2022

The manufacturing industry is going through the process of digital transformation. The central part of digital transformation in every industry...

15 July, 2016

PLM is transforming from pure engineering discipline into platform capable to manage a diverse set of data and processes. I...

7 October, 2013

Salesforce.com is well know CRM provider. More than that, Salesforce.com is well know by pioneering SaaS and later Cloud applications....

6 January, 2021

Each time any major PLM vendor makes a big step onto the acquisition path, the questions about how the technologies...

17 December, 2019

I’ve been coming to Solidworks World for many years. I did it as a Dassault System employee, startup founder, and...

20 July, 2024

The discussion about PLM as a business and PLM as a software are not new. When someone asks me about...

28 February, 2011

I read Martyn Day article The Jim Heppelmann Interview. Mr. Heppelmann shared his thoughts about different aspects related to PTC,...

20 February, 2022

In the world of business, technology is ever-evolving. With new advancements in software and hardware, businesses are able to operate...

5 December, 2012

Enterprise software is a complicated beast. PLM is not an exclusion from the list. Despite demands to be simplified and...

Blogroll

To the top