A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Will Master Data Management (MDM) work for PLM?

Will Master Data Management (MDM) work for PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
23 April, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Lately, I’ve seen a potential for a growth in Master Data Management (MDM) initiatives. For those who don’t know MDM technologies are, I recommend you start with Wikipedia and check out the links of the MDM offering by IBM, Oracle and some other large IT vendors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_Data_Management

http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Master_Data_Management/

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVWt-CsNBnU]

Looking at the broad range of PLM capabilities and needs, I noticed that some of them deal with non-transactional and released products, and referenced data. This released data is need by various departments in the organization. The ability to find relevant product data related to a specific design as well as to change things from the past is growing. With growth of regulations in today’s word, being able to track and discover designs in the vault is a real need that can provide fast ROI

mdm-for-plm

So, can you figure out the math between having to access non-transactional product data and master data management technologies?. At first glance, this is something that can be validated and tested.

The following are some pros and cons for using MDM in the context of PLM:.

Pros:

· Reliable infrastructure to manage a single source of information

· Ability to redistribute information across the organization

· Global data availability in the organization

Cons:

· Expensive data transformation when you move data from design

· Not flexible for scenarios where back-reference to original data is needed.

· Data redundancy

What will be the future of MDM in the context of Product Development and Product lifecycle Management? Although there is some potential here, Master Data Management needs to adopt a flexible ability to play around various scenarios related to data referencing and data retention; I hardly see it being applied “as is” to product development today.

What is your opinion?

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 May, 2011

This evening I had pre-meeting talks in Eurostep office located in Stockholm neighborhood. In preparation for the Eurostep 2011 event,...

15 February, 2023

3D EXPERIENCE WORLD is an annual event organized by Dassault Systemes and formerly known as SOLIDWORKS WORLD is back to...

11 December, 2018

Everyone needs data, but nobody wants to be responsible for data management. I learned it during many years of working...

22 June, 2010

I’d suggest to have some fun in the beginning. What is PUI? Do you think this is a new PLM...

2 June, 2024

Data is playing a key role in engineering and manufacturing processes these days. In the past, companies relies on drawings...

4 February, 2020

PI PLMx event is happening these days in London. I wasn’t able to attend this year. The tagline How PLM...

28 September, 2018

It is a bit unusual blog for me. Last year, I published few articles that triggered discussions in PLM blogs....

30 April, 2012

I’m off to Detroit, MI this week for Aras PLM user conference – ACE 2012. Microsoft .NET and MS SQL are...

8 April, 2019

I continue to share my thoughts and impression from last week SuiteWorld 2019 event. If you missed some of my...

Blogroll

To the top