A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to Improve Engineering Change Processes using Enterprise 2.0 Technologies?

How to Improve Engineering Change Processes using Enterprise 2.0 Technologies?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
22 April, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I think that using Enterprise 2.0 technologies for Product Lifecycle can bring significant improvement in implementation and services. Today’s traditional approach is to use workflow-based tools to implement ECO processes. Is this good? Yes, it’s probably good, but at the same time, establishing such implementation can be relatively complex. You need to rely on database management tools and process management infrastructure. This is expensive. What alternative do we have today? I noticed that there is an emerging group of software which is starting to be referred to as Enterprise 2.0. Although there isn’t a consolidated agreement as to the scope of Enterprise 2.0 software, but there does seem to be a reference to a group of software tools and technologies that use Web tools for collaboration.

So, a typical, traditional ECO implementation includes the following components: Data, Process and Collaboration. Data allows you to keep information about ECO and link to the relevant CAD files located in a vault. Process allows you to set up a workflow to pass ECO information and requests among people in an organization. Collaboration tools are dedicated tools that allow you to present connected information about change and design to users. Collaboration tools normally include data and visual tools. Most of such implementations today are based on proprietarily rich (windows) clients and web tools. Workflow implementations in most cases rely on proprietary process tools, and sometime rely on IT process middleware. Overall, such implementation requires significant planning of everything – starting from ECO data through down to processes and people communication.

How we can make this implementation simpler and cut implementation costs? First of all – managing of all data natively in RDBM can be replaced by an implementation based on Wiki. This would allow us to keep information about ECO and reuse regular Web wiki editing tools to put information there. Depending on the Wiki engines you choose, you will have already user interface (web like) and data capture capabilities. You can tag this information and make it easy to search using desktop and/or enterprise search engines. Approvals and ECO process can be part of associated Wiki page data and ad-hoc collaboration. To establish more formal process you can use built-in workflow engines (i.e. Windows Workflow Foundation etc.). And last but not least is collaboration. Your environment can be Web-based and use all Web-based collaboration tools, and co-editing web pages. Additional power is that all ECO information can be easily shared as regular URLs. Additional interest can be gained by using subscription models similar to RSS. These can easily be applied on native web data and gives you the ability to use organizational information to discover which people to whom you should connect..

I believe, we are only in the beginning of Enterprise 2.0 tools introduction in organization, but for me it looks very promising…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xKSJfQh89k]

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 June, 2015

Platformizaiton in PLM is an interesting trend. If this is a first time you hear about “platformization”, you are not...

15 February, 2012

Cloud is one of my favorite topics. Back, two years ago, on SWW 2010, SolidWorks made a broad statement about...

8 March, 2017

I posted about my view on the process of digital transformation and how digitalization can come to manufacturing and more specifically...

24 June, 2018

Few presentations from last week 3DEXPERIENCE forum in Boston made me think about trajectories of BIM and PLM. In the...

23 March, 2025

There’s a classic saying: “If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” Most of the time,...

11 July, 2009

I’m excited! 6 month and 1 week ago I started this blog. This is time for the short conclusion. So...

14 July, 2026

I continue my article series about IFIP PLM 2026 in Lecce, Italy. If you missed my previous articles, check them...

15 December, 2011

Let’s talk about emails today. How many of them are you reading or writing daily? A lot? Emails are with...

20 July, 2010

Almost a year ago, I posted PLM and BIM – Common Roots Or Common Future. I think these two domains will...

Blogroll

To the top